ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017
High-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation modulates interhemispheric inhibition in healthy humans.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intersegmental Modulation of Lower-Limb Corticospinal Excitability and Inhibition Induced by Upper-Limb Isometric Contractions: A Systematic Review.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Task-Oriented Mirror Therapy Training on Hand Rehabilitation of Acute Stroke Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Trial
- Electrical spinal cord stimulation promotes focal sensorimotor activation that accelerates brain-computer interface skill learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Epineural stimulation on distal brachial plexus for functional restoration of the upper limb in a primate study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Frequency-dependent effects of superimposed NMES on spinal excitability in upper and lower limb muscles.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Does Not Influence Spinal Excitability in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of acute responses in spinal excitability between older and young people after neuromuscular electrical stimulation.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Adjustments in the motor unit discharge behavior following neuromuscular electrical stimulation compared to voluntary contractions.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function.PloS one · 2022Article
- Modulation of spinal excitability following neuromuscular electrical stimulation superimposed to voluntary contraction.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Article
- Neuromuscular adaptations to wide-pulse high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation training.European journal of applied physiology · 2019Article
- The modulation of force steadiness by electrical nerve stimulation applied to the wrist extensors differs for young and older adults.European journal of applied physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (HF NMES) induces muscular contractions through neural mechanisms that partially match physiological motor control. Indeed, a portion of the contraction arises from central mechanisms, whereby spinal motoneurons are recruited through the evoked sensory volley. However, the involvement of supraspinal centers of motor control during such stimulation remains poorly understood. Therefore, we tested whether a single HF NMES session applied to the upper limb influences interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) from left to right motor cortex (M1). Using noninvasive electrophysiology and transcranial magnetic stimulation, we evaluated the effects of a 10-min HF NMES session applied to a right wrist flexor on spinal and corticospinal excitability of both arms, as well as IHI, in healthy subjects. HF NMES induced a rapid decline in spinal excitability on the right stimulated side that closely matched the modulation of evoked force during the protocol. More importantly, IHI was significantly increased by HF NMES, and this increase was correlated to the electromyographic activity within the contralateral homologous muscle. Our study highlights a new neurophysiological mechanism, suggesting that HF NMES has an effect on the excitability of the transcallosal pathway probably to regulate the lateralization of the motor output. The data suggest that HF NMES can modify the hemispheric balance between both M1 areas. These findings provide important novel perspectives for the implementation of HF NMES in sport training and neurorehabilitation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: High-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (HF NMES) induces muscular contractions that partially match physiological motor control. Here, we tested whether HF NMES applied to the upper limb influences interhemispheric inhibition. Our results show that interhemispheric inhibition was increased after HF NMES and that this increase was correlated to the electromyographic activity within the contralateral homologous muscle. This opens up original perspectives for the implementation of HF NMES in sport training and neurorehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.