Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27832498›Full record

SynthesisFamilial cancer2017

Analysis of a RECQL splicing mutation, c.1667_1667+3delAGTA, in breast cancer patients and controls from Central Europe.

Natalia Bogdanova, Katja Pfeifer, Peter Schürmann, Natalia Antonenkova, Wulf Siggelkow, Hans Christiansen, Peter Hillemanns, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Thilo Dörk

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Familial cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. GermlineFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. RecQ Helicase Somatic Alterations in Cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. BeyondJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Allelic variants of breast cancer susceptibility genesHereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalia BogdanovaClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Katja PfeiferClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Peter SchürmannClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Natalia AntonenkovaN.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus.
Wulf SiggelkowHospital DIAKOVERE Henriettenstift, Hannover, Germany.
Hans ChristiansenClinics of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Peter HillemannsClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Tjoung-Won Park-SimonClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Thilo DörkClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. doerk.thilo@mh-hannover.de.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEDIAKO · DEN.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre · BY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RECQL is a DNA helicase required for genomic stability. Two studies have recently identified RECQL as a novel breast cancer susceptibility gene. The most common RECQL mutation, the 4 bp-deletion c.1667_1667+3delAGTA, was five-fold enriched in Polish breast cancer patients, but the exact magnitude of the risk is uncertain. We investigated two hospital-based breast cancer case-control series from Belarus and Germany, respectively, comprising a total of 2596 breast cancer patients and 2132 healthy females. The mutation was found in 9 cases and 6 controls, with an adjusted Odds Ratio 1.23 (95% CI 0.44-3.47; p = 0.69) in the combined analysis. Among the cases, heterozygosity for c.1667_1667+3delAGTA was linked with estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer. There was no significant difference in age at diagnosis between carriers and non-carriers, and only one of the carriers reported a first-degree family history. Meta-analysis with the initial study from Poland suggests an about two-fold increase in risk for this mutation (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.13-5.57, p = 0.02). Altogether, the data indicate that RECQL* c.1667_1667+3delAGTA is not a high-risk mutation for breast cancer though it could represent a moderate-risk breast cancer susceptibility allele. Further studies will be required to determine the clinical significance of testing for this RECQL mutation.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAgedAllelesBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleFounder EffectGermanyHeterozygoteHumansMiddle AgedMutationOdds RatioPolandReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, EstrogenRecQ HelicasesRECQL protein, humanBreast carcinomaChromosome breakage syndromeDNA double-strand break repairFounder mutationGenetic susceptibility

Identifiers

PMID27832498
OpenAlexW2554902834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.