Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27832465›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2017

Ethnographic analysis on the use of the electronic medical record for clinical handoff.

Philippa Nelson, Anthony J Bell, Larry Nathanson, Leon D Sanchez, Jonathan Fisher, Philip D Anderson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philippa NelsonMedical Services, Logan Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Anthony J BellRBWH Department of Emergency Medicine, Butterfield St, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia. Anthony.bell@health.qld.gov.au.
Larry NathansonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, USA.
Leon D SanchezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, USA.
Jonathan FisherDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, USA.
Philip D AndersonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, USA.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USLogan Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to understand the social elements of clinical and organizational interactions of the key stakeholders in the specific context of an electronic dashboard used by the emergency department (ED) and inpatient medicine teams at the time of clinical referral and handover. An electronic handover function is utilised at the ED-inpatient interface at this institution and has given clinicians the ability to better communicate, monitor the department and strive to improve patient safety in streamline the delivery of care in the acute phase. This study uses an ethnographic qualitative research design incorporating semistructured interviews, participant observation on the ED floor and fieldwork notes. The setting for this research was in the ED at a tertiary University affiliated hospital. Triangulation was used to combine information obtained from multiple sources and information from fieldwork and interviews refined into useable chunks culminating in a thematic analysis. Thematic analysis yielded five central themes that reflected how the clinical staff utilised this IT system and why it had become embedded in the culture of clinical referral and handover. Efficient time management for improved patient flow was demonstrated, value added communication (at the interpersonal level), the building trust at the ED-inpatient interface, the maintenance of mutual respect across medical cultures and an overall enhancement of the quality of ED communication (in terms of the information available). A robust electronic handover process, resulted in an integrated approach to patient care by removing barriers to admission for medical inpatients, admitted via ED. The value proposition for patients was a more complete information transfer, both within the ED and between departments.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsAnthropology, CulturalContinuity of Patient CareElectronic Health RecordsEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPatient HandoffQualitative ResearchTime FactorsCommunicationElectronic health recordEmergency departmentInternal medicinePatient handoff

Identifiers

PMID27832465
OpenAlexW2556507517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.