Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27832404›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016

Pharmacist-only trimethoprim: pharmacist satisfaction on their training and the impact on their practice.

Rhiannon Braund, Emily Henderson, Erica McNab, Rachel Sarten, Emily Wallace, Natalie Gauld

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rhiannon BraundClinical Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. Rhiannon.braund@otago.ac.nz.
Emily HendersonClinical Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Erica McNabClinical Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Rachel SartenClinical Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Emily WallaceClinical Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Natalie GauldHonorary Research Fellow, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background In 2012, in a first for the developed world, New Zealand reclassified trimethoprim to allow specially trained pharmacists to supply the medicine without a prescription to women with cystitis fitting specific criteria. Objective This study explored pharmacists' views of the training and screening tool, impact on practice, and the pharmacists' perceptions of views of patients and doctors. Methods Structured interviews were conducted with 28 New Zealand pharmacists trained to supply trimethoprim. These pharmacists were selected to represent geographical spread as well as urban, suburban and rural. The key areas for investigation were: satisfaction about training, appropriateness of training, opinions on the screening tool, impact on clinical practice and perception of others. Audio recorded interviews were thematically analyzed. Results Of 40 pharmacies invited, 28 pharmacists agreed to participate. Most pharmacists were positive about being able to supply trimethoprim, the training and increased clinical focus of their practice. The content of the training was considered appropriate, as was the screening tool, which was well utilised during consultations. Minor suggestions on the training and consultation materials were provided. Some pharmacists reported that referral to the doctor without supply in a minority of trimethoprim consultations, frustrated some women. Frequency of supplies varied considerably by pharmacists from none supplied to weekly supplies. Some pharmacists questioned the exclusion to supply for women who had taken antibiotics in the last six months. Many women had reportedly appreciated the easier access in the pharmacy compared with doctor access, especially at weekends, but sometimes misunderstood the role of the pharmacist in the supply. While pharmacists reported that some doctors had been negative about pharmacist-supply, others were informing women about the service from the pharmacist. Conclusion Pharmacist supply of trimethoprim using mandated training and a screening tool or algorithm for supply is workable and well-accepted by pharmacists. Minor changes have been recommended. Further research is needed to understand perspectives of other stakeholders (women, doctors and practice nurses) and outcomes for patients.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAnti-Infective Agents, UrinaryCystitisFemaleHumansMaleNew ZealandPharmacistsProfessional RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesTrimethoprimAnti-Infective Agents, UrinaryTrimethoprimAnti-bacterial agentsCommunity pharmacy servicesCystitisNew ZealandNonprescription drugsPharmacist opinionReclassification

Identifiers

PMID27832404
OpenAlexW2555424305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.