ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016
Pharmacist-only trimethoprim: pharmacist satisfaction on their training and the impact on their practice.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Double-Dosing and Other Dangers with Non-Prescription Medicines: Pharmacists' Views and Experiences.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Pharmacist supply of sildenafil: pharmacists' experiences and perceptions on training and tools for supply.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Article
- Antibiotic treatment of women with uncomplicated cystitis before and after allowing pharmacist-supply of trimethoprim.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background In 2012, in a first for the developed world, New Zealand reclassified trimethoprim to allow specially trained pharmacists to supply the medicine without a prescription to women with cystitis fitting specific criteria. Objective This study explored pharmacists' views of the training and screening tool, impact on practice, and the pharmacists' perceptions of views of patients and doctors. Methods Structured interviews were conducted with 28 New Zealand pharmacists trained to supply trimethoprim. These pharmacists were selected to represent geographical spread as well as urban, suburban and rural. The key areas for investigation were: satisfaction about training, appropriateness of training, opinions on the screening tool, impact on clinical practice and perception of others. Audio recorded interviews were thematically analyzed. Results Of 40 pharmacies invited, 28 pharmacists agreed to participate. Most pharmacists were positive about being able to supply trimethoprim, the training and increased clinical focus of their practice. The content of the training was considered appropriate, as was the screening tool, which was well utilised during consultations. Minor suggestions on the training and consultation materials were provided. Some pharmacists reported that referral to the doctor without supply in a minority of trimethoprim consultations, frustrated some women. Frequency of supplies varied considerably by pharmacists from none supplied to weekly supplies. Some pharmacists questioned the exclusion to supply for women who had taken antibiotics in the last six months. Many women had reportedly appreciated the easier access in the pharmacy compared with doctor access, especially at weekends, but sometimes misunderstood the role of the pharmacist in the supply. While pharmacists reported that some doctors had been negative about pharmacist-supply, others were informing women about the service from the pharmacist. Conclusion Pharmacist supply of trimethoprim using mandated training and a screening tool or algorithm for supply is workable and well-accepted by pharmacists. Minor changes have been recommended. Further research is needed to understand perspectives of other stakeholders (women, doctors and practice nurses) and outcomes for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.