Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27832298›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2017

[Recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy and PDE-5 inhibitor intake].

L Hofer, J P Radtke, C Rapp, S Pahernik, D Teber, M Hohenfellner, B Hadaschik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L HoferUrologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. luisa.hofer@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
J P RadtkeUrologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
C RappUrologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
S PahernikUrologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
D TeberUrologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
M HohenfellnerUrologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
B HadaschikUrologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors are widely used for penile rehabilitation and treatment of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Recently, Michl et al. showed in a monocentric, retrospective and non-randomized analysis that PDE-5 inhibitors may cause higher biochemical recurrence rates after radical prostatectomy. This unexpected and serious adverse side effect of PDE-5 inhibitors was scrutinized on the basis of patients in our prospective tumor database. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included 358 patients after radical prostatectomy with bilateral nerve-sparing and without neo- or adjuvant therapy during 2004 and 2015. In all, 65.9% of the patients regularly took PDE-5 inhibitors postoperatively, 34.1% did not. Patients with sporadic use were excluded from the primary analysis. We used Kaplan-Mayer analysis to compare biochemical recurrence rates in both groups (endpoint: PSA > 0.2 ng/ml or salvage therapy).

resultsBoth groups showed comparable clinical parameters. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (p = 0.9334): 60 months postoperatively 90.4% of men with PDE-5 intake vs. 90.8% of men without intake of PDE-5 inhibitors were recurrence-free.

conclusionAlthough our analysis was constructed similar to the analysis of Michl et al., we could not confirm their results. Taken together with recent cohort study from Scandinavia, postoperative prescription of PDE-5 inhibitors seems to be safe and should be discussed with patients.

Indexed as

CausalityCombined Modality TherapyComorbidityDisease-Free SurvivalErectile DysfunctionGermanyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPrevalenceProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsBiochemical recurrenceErectile dysfunctionPhosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitorProstate cancerRadical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID27832298
OpenAlexW2563861528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.