Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27832178›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

A Nested PCR Assay to Avoid False Positive Detection of the Microsporidian Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) in Environmental Samples in Shrimp Farms.

Pattana Jaroenlak, Piyachat Sanguanrut, Bryony A P Williams, Grant D Stentiford, Timothy W Flegel, Kallaya Sritunyalucksana, Ornchuma Itsathitphaisarn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Regional Prevalence and Molecular Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Detection and Genetic Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Pathogenic Mechanism ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  18. Las Bolitas Syndrome inMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pattana JaroenlakDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piyachat SanguanrutCenter of Excellence for Shrimp Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (Centex Shrimp), Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Bryony A P WilliamsBiosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Grant D StentifordEuropean Community Reference Laboratory for Crustacean Diseases, Center for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth, Dorset, United Kingdom.
Timothy W FlegelCenter of Excellence for Shrimp Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (Centex Shrimp), Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kallaya SritunyalucksanaShrimp Pathogen Interaction Laboratory (SPI), National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), Bangkok, Thailand.
Ornchuma ItsathitphaisarnDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0371-3877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatopancreatic microsporidiosis (HPM) caused by Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) is an important disease of cultivated shrimp. Heavy infections may lead to retarded growth and unprofitable harvests. Existing PCR detection methods target the EHP small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene (SSU-PCR). However, we discovered that they can give false positive test results due to cross reactivity of the SSU-PCR primers with DNA from closely related microsporidia that infect other aquatic organisms. This is problematic for investigating and monitoring EHP infection pathways. To overcome this problem, a sensitive and specific nested PCR method was developed for detection of the spore wall protein (SWP) gene of EHP (SWP-PCR). The new SWP-PCR method did not produce false positive results from closely related microsporidia. The first PCR step of the SWP-PCR method was 100 times (104 plasmid copies per reaction vial) more sensitive than that of the existing SSU-PCR method (106 copies) but sensitivity was equal for both in the nested step (10 copies). Since the hepatopancreas of cultivated shrimp is not currently known to be infected with microsporidia other than EHP, the SSU-PCR methods are still valid for analyzing hepatopancreatic samples despite the lower sensitivity than the SWP-PCR method. However, due to its greater specificity and sensitivity, we recommend that the SWP-PCR method be used to screen for EHP in feces, feed and environmental samples for potential EHP carriers.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceDNA, FungalEnterocytozoonFisheriesIn Situ HybridizationMicrosporidiosisPenaeidaePolymerase Chain ReactionSequence AlignmentShellfishDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID27832178
PMCPMC5104377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.