ArticlePloS one2016
Detecting Mechanisms of Karyotype Evolution in Heterotaxis (Orchidaceae).
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Overview of Orchidaceae from Brazil: Advances and Shortfalls After 400 Years of Studies.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Optimization of Chromosome Preparation and Karyotype Analysis of Winter Turnip Rape (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Synthetic Tetraploid of Oncidium crispum Lodd. (Orchidaceae).Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Comprehensive mapping of molecular cytogenetic markers in pitaya (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Karyotyping of aneuploid and polyploid plants from low coverage whole-genome resequencing.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Pervasive Introgression During Rapid Diversification of the European Mountain Genus Soldanella (L.) (Primulaceae).Systematic biology · 2023Article
- Are chromosome number and genome size associated with habit and environmental niche variables? Insights from the Neotropical orchids.Annals of botany · 2022Article
- Megasporogenesis, megagametogenesis, and embryogenesis in Maxillaria crassifolia (Lindl.) Rchb.f. (Cymbidieae, Orchidaceae).Protoplasma · 2022Article
- Chromosome Number and Genome Size Evolution inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Molecular and Cytogenetic Analysis of rDNA Evolution in Crepis Sensu Lato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Mechanisms of karyotype evolution in the Brazilian scorpions of the subfamily Centruroidinae (Buthidae).Genetica · 2018Article
- Article
- Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae.Genetics and molecular biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The karyotype is shaped by different chromosome rearrangements during species evolution. However, determining which rearrangements are responsible for karyotype changes is a challenging task and the combination of a robust phylogeny with refined karyotype characterization, GS measurements and bioinformatic modelling is necessary. Here, this approach was applied in Heterotaxis to determine what chromosome rearrangements were responsible for the dysploidy variation. We used two datasets (nrDNA and cpDNA, both under MP and BI) to infer the phylogenetic relationships among Heterotaxis species and the closely related genera Nitidobulbon and Ornithidium. Such phylogenies were used as framework to infer how karyotype evolution occurred using statistical methods. The nrDNA recovered Ornithidium, Nitidobulbon and Heterotaxis as monophyletic under both MP and BI; while cpDNA could not completely separate the three genera under both methods. Based on the GS, we recovered two groups within Heterotaxis: (1) "small GS", corresponding to the Sessilis grade, composed of plants with smaller genomes and smaller morphological structure, and (2) "large GS", corresponding to the Discolor clade, composed of plants with large genomes and robust morphological structures. The robust karyotype modeling, using both nrDNA phylogenies, allowed us to infer that the ancestral Heterotaxis karyotype presented 2n = 40, probably with a proximal 45S rDNA on a metacentric chromosome pair. The chromosome number variation was caused by ascending dysploidy (chromosome fission involving the proximal 45S rDNA site resulting in two acrocentric chromosome pairs holding a terminal 45S rDNA), with subsequent descending dysploidy (fusion) in two species, H. maleolens and H. sessilis. However, besides dysploidy, our analysis detected another important chromosome rearrangement in the Orchidaceae: chromosome inversion, that promoted 5S rDNA site duplication and relocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.