Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27832130›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Detecting Mechanisms of Karyotype Evolution in Heterotaxis (Orchidaceae).

Ana Paula Moraes, André Olmos Simões, Dario Isidro Ojeda Alayon, Fábio de Barros, Eliana Regina Forni-Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Synthetic Tetraploid of Oncidium crispum Lodd. (Orchidaceae).Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chromosome Number and Genome Size Evolution inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Molecular and Cytogenetic Analysis of rDNA Evolution in Crepis Sensu Lato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Paula MoraesDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas/UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9878-3925
André Olmos SimõesDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas/UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil.
Dario Isidro Ojeda AlayonThe Biodiversity Research Center and Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Fábio de BarrosInstituto de Botânica, São Paulo, Brasil.
Eliana Regina Forni-MartinsDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas/UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The karyotype is shaped by different chromosome rearrangements during species evolution. However, determining which rearrangements are responsible for karyotype changes is a challenging task and the combination of a robust phylogeny with refined karyotype characterization, GS measurements and bioinformatic modelling is necessary. Here, this approach was applied in Heterotaxis to determine what chromosome rearrangements were responsible for the dysploidy variation. We used two datasets (nrDNA and cpDNA, both under MP and BI) to infer the phylogenetic relationships among Heterotaxis species and the closely related genera Nitidobulbon and Ornithidium. Such phylogenies were used as framework to infer how karyotype evolution occurred using statistical methods. The nrDNA recovered Ornithidium, Nitidobulbon and Heterotaxis as monophyletic under both MP and BI; while cpDNA could not completely separate the three genera under both methods. Based on the GS, we recovered two groups within Heterotaxis: (1) "small GS", corresponding to the Sessilis grade, composed of plants with smaller genomes and smaller morphological structure, and (2) "large GS", corresponding to the Discolor clade, composed of plants with large genomes and robust morphological structures. The robust karyotype modeling, using both nrDNA phylogenies, allowed us to infer that the ancestral Heterotaxis karyotype presented 2n = 40, probably with a proximal 45S rDNA on a metacentric chromosome pair. The chromosome number variation was caused by ascending dysploidy (chromosome fission involving the proximal 45S rDNA site resulting in two acrocentric chromosome pairs holding a terminal 45S rDNA), with subsequent descending dysploidy (fusion) in two species, H. maleolens and H. sessilis. However, besides dysploidy, our analysis detected another important chromosome rearrangement in the Orchidaceae: chromosome inversion, that promoted 5S rDNA site duplication and relocation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, PlantChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantDNA, RibosomalKaryotypeKaryotypingOrchidaceaePhylogenyDNA, PlantDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID27832130
PMCPMC5104408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.