Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27832091›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Impedance Flow Cytometry: A Novel Technique in Pollen Analysis.

Iris Heidmann, Grit Schade-Kampmann, Joep Lambalk, Marcel Ottiger, Marco Di Berardino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Quantification of pollen viability inQuantitative plant biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Overcoming roadblocks forFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iris HeidmannEnza Zaden, Research and Development B.V. P.O. Box 7, 1600AA Enkhuizen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4389-2120
Grit Schade-KampmannAmphasys AG, Technopark Lucerne, 6039 Root D4, Switzerland.
Joep LambalkEnza Zaden, Research and Development B.V. P.O. Box 7, 1600AA Enkhuizen, The Netherlands.
Marcel OttigerAmphasys AG, Technopark Lucerne, 6039 Root D4, Switzerland.
Marco Di BerardinoAmphasys AG, Technopark Lucerne, 6039 Root D4, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn efficient and reliable method to estimate plant cell viability, especially of pollen, is important for plant breeding research and plant production processes. Pollen quality is determined by classical methods, like staining techniques or in vitro pollen germination, each having disadvantages with respect to reliability, analysis speed, and species dependency. Analysing single cells based on their dielectric properties by impedance flow cytometry (IFC) has developed into a common method for cellular characterisation in microbiology and medicine during the last decade. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the potential of IFC in plant cell analysis with the focus on pollen.

methodDeveloping and mature pollen grains were analysed during their passage through a microfluidic chip to which radio frequencies of 0.5 to 12 MHz were applied. The acquired data provided information about the developmental stage, viability, and germination capacity. The biological relevance of the acquired IFC data was confirmed by classical staining methods, inactivation controls, as well as pollen germination assays.

resultsDifferent stages of developing pollen, dead, viable and germinating pollen populations could be detected and quantified by IFC. Pollen viability analysis by classical FDA staining showed a high correlation with IFC data. In parallel, pollen with active germination potential could be discriminated from the dead and the viable but non-germinating population.

conclusionThe presented data demonstrate that IFC is an efficient, label-free, reliable and non-destructive technique to analyse pollen quality in a species-independent manner.

Indexed as

GerminationCapsicumCell SurvivalCucumis sativusElectric ImpedanceFlow CytometryLab-On-A-Chip DevicesNicotianaPollenRadio WavesSingle-Cell AnalysisSolanum

Identifiers

PMID27832091
PMCPMC5104384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.