Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27832066›Full record

ReviewPLoS biology2016

Modifiers of the Genotype-Phenotype Map: Hsp90 and Beyond.

Rachel Schell, Martin Mullis, Ian M Ehrenreich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Decanalizing thinking on genetic canalization.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chaperones, Canalization, and Evolution of Animal Forms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Genetic suppression: Extending our knowledge from lab experiments to natural populations.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel SchellMolecular and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Martin MullisMolecular and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Ian M EhrenreichMolecular and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Funding

Comprehensive dissection of higher-order genetic interactionsR01GM110255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EHRENREICH, IAN MICHAEL · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruption of certain genes alters the heritable phenotypic variation among individuals. Research on the chaperone Hsp90 has played a central role in determining the genetic basis of this phenomenon, which may be important to evolution and disease. Key studies have shown that Hsp90 perturbation modifies the effects of many genetic variants throughout the genome. These modifications collectively transform the genotype-phenotype map, often resulting in a net increase or decrease in heritable phenotypic variation. Here, we summarize some of the foundational work on Hsp90 that led to these insights, discuss a framework for interpreting this research that is centered upon the standard genetics concept of epistasis, and propose major questions that future studies in this area should address.

Indexed as

GenotypePhenotypeEpistasis, GeneticHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansSelection, GeneticHSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27832066
PMCPMC5104472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.