ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Ten Simple Rules for Developing Public Biological Databases.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interacting Species Database (ISDB): comprehensive resource for interspecies interactions at the molecular level.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- React-to-Me: A Conversational Interface for Interactive Exploration of the Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase.Research square · 2026Article
- Architectural good practices for reproducible benchmarking in protein machine learning.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- React-to-Me: A Conversational Interface for Interactive Exploration of the Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Chemoarchitectural studies of the rat hypothalamus and zona incerta.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
- DBHR: a collection of databases relevant to human research.Future science OA · 2022Review
- Ten simple rules for researchers who want to develop web apps.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- GeneCloudOmics: A Data Analytic Cloud Platform for High-Throughput Gene Expression Analysis.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Systems biology approaches integrated with artificial intelligence for optimized metabolic engineering.Metabolic engineering communications · 2020Review
- Ten simple rules for writing a paper about scientific software.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- CrustyBase: an interactive online database for crustacean transcriptomes.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Ten quick tips for biocuration.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Automated assessment of biological database assertions using the scientific literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- BIOFACQUIM: A Mexican Compound Database of Natural Products.Biomolecules · 2019Article
- Transcriptional Regulation of Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Plants: So Many Regulators, So Little Consensus.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Review
- Ten simple rules for biologists learning to program.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.