Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27830791›Full record

ReviewNature2016

The activities of amyloids from a structural perspective.

Roland Riek, David S Eisenberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 218 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
218citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

218 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Current Understanding of Protein Aggregation in Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

158 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roland RiekLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
David S EisenbergUCLA-DOE Institute, Los Angeles, California 90095-1570, USA.

Funding

Structural Biology of Amyloid DiseaseR01AG029430 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI EISENBERG, DAVID · 2007 to 2016
$3.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteUS National Institutes of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aggregation of proteins into structures known as amyloids is observed in many neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. Amyloids are composed of pairs of tightly interacting, many stranded and repetitive intermolecular β-sheets, which form the cross-β-sheet structure. This structure enables amyloids to grow by recruitment of the same protein and its repetition can transform a weak biological activity into a potent one through cooperativity and avidity. Amyloids therefore have the potential to self-replicate and can adapt to the environment, yielding cell-to-cell transmissibility, prion infectivity and toxicity.

Indexed as

alpha-SynucleinAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsHumansModels, MolecularPrionsProtein Structure, Secondaryalpha-SynucleinAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesPrions

Identifiers

PMID27830791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.