Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27830729›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Causal Evidence for the Role of Specific GABAergic Interneuron Types in Entorhinal Recruitment of Dentate Granule Cells.

Cheng-Ta Lee, Min-Hua Kao, Wen-Hsien Hou, Yu-Ting Wei, Chin-Lin Chen, Cheng-Chang Lien

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Differential expression of GABAFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Deficits in Behavioral and Neuronal Pattern Separation in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  19. The Entorhinal Cortex and Adult Neurogenesis in Major Depression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Hypothalamic Glutamate/GABA Cotransmission Modulates Hippocampal Circuits and Supports Long-Term Potentiation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cheng-Ta LeeInstitute of Neuroscience, National Yang-Ming University, 155, Section 2, Li-Nong Street, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Min-Hua KaoInstitute of Neuroscience, National Yang-Ming University, 155, Section 2, Li-Nong Street, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Wen-Hsien HouInstitute of Neuroscience, National Yang-Ming University, 155, Section 2, Li-Nong Street, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Yu-Ting WeiInstitute of Neuroscience, National Yang-Ming University, 155, Section 2, Li-Nong Street, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Chin-Lin ChenInstitute of Neuroscience, National Yang-Ming University, 155, Section 2, Li-Nong Street, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Cheng-Chang LienInstitute of Neuroscience, National Yang-Ming University, 155, Section 2, Li-Nong Street, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dentate gyrus (DG) is the primary gate of the hippocampus and controls information flow from the cortex to the hippocampus proper. To maintain normal function, granule cells (GCs), the principal neurons in the DG, receive fine-tuned inhibition from local-circuit GABAergic inhibitory interneurons (INs). Abnormalities of GABAergic circuits in the DG are associated with several brain disorders, including epilepsy, autism, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer disease. Therefore, understanding the network mechanisms of inhibitory control of GCs is of functional and pathophysiological importance. GABAergic inhibitory INs are heterogeneous, but it is unclear how individual subtypes contribute to GC activity. Using cell-type-specific optogenetic perturbation, we investigated whether and how two major IN populations defined by parvalbumin (PV) and somatostatin (SST) expression, regulate GC input transformations. We showed that PV-expressing (PV+) INs, and not SST-expressing (SST+) INs, primarily suppress GC responses to single cortical stimulation. In addition, these two IN classes differentially regulate GC responses to θ and γ frequency inputs from the cortex. Notably, PV+ INs specifically control the onset of the spike series, whereas SST+ INs preferentially regulate the later spikes in the series. Together, PV+ and SST+ GABAergic INs engage differentially in GC input-output transformations in response to various activity patterns.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsDentate GyrusEntorhinal CortexFemaleGABAergic NeuronsInterneuronsMaleMice, Inbred C57BLNerve NetRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID27830729
PMCPMC5103275
OpenAlexW2554057527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.