Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27830372›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2017

Molecular identification of bacterial endosymbionts of Sappinia strains.

Daniele Corsaro, Claudia Wylezich, Julia Walochnik, Danielle Venditti, Rolf Michel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Nramp: Deprive and conquer?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniele CorsaroCHLAREAS - Chlamydia Research Association, 12 rue du Maconnais, F-54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. corsaro@gmx.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1754-1546
Claudia WylezichIOW-Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Biological Oceanography, Seestr. 15, 18119, Rostock, Germany.
Julia WalochnikMolecular Parasitology, Institute for Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Danielle VendittiCHLAREAS - Chlamydia Research Association, 12 rue du Maconnais, F-54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Rolf MichelCentral Institute of the Federal Armed Forces Medical Services, P.O. Box 7340, 56070, Koblenz, Germany.
Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Neuchâtel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genus Sappinia comprises free-living amoebae occurring worldwide in a variety of habitats such as soils, plant matter and freshwater ponds, but also animal faeces, and includes at present three species, S. pedata, S. diploidea and S. platani. The genus is potentially pathogenic, as indicated by the identification of S. pedata in a case of human amoebic encephalitis. Electron microscopy studies on some strains already revealed intracellular bacteria in Sappinia. In the current study, we performed 16S ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) analysis of these bacterial endosymbionts. We first inferred relationships among Sappinia strains on the basis of 18S rDNA, demonstrating that S. pedata emerged as sister to a larger clade including S. diploidea, S. platani and a few 'S. diploidea-like' strains. Thus, bacterial 16S rDNA was searched for in representative strains of each Sappinia species/subgroup. We found that Sappinia strains were associated to distinct species of Flavobacterium or Pedobacter (phylum Bacteroidetes). These appear to be distributed following the amoebal host subgroups, and are not directly related to other Bacteroidetes species known as interacting with free-living amoebae. While all the endosymbionts' close relatives are known to grow on agar, bacteriological media inoculated with amoebal extracts remained negative. Overall, results indicate that the recovered bacteria are likely specific obligate endosymbionts of Sappinia species. Further studies, including additional amoebal strains and deep morphological and molecular analyses, will be necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

Indexed as

SymbiosisAmoebozoaAnimalsBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SEndosymbiontFlavobacteriumFree-living amoebaePedobacterSappinia

Identifiers

PMID27830372
OpenAlexW2556928281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.