ArticleParasitology research2017
Molecular identification of bacterial endosymbionts of Sappinia strains.
Article in Parasitology research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphological, Genetic, and Microbiological Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- A genetically tractable branch of environmental Pedobacter from the phylum Bacteroidota represents a hotspot for natural product discovery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microbiome of Free-Living Amoebae (FLA) Isolated from Fresh Organic Produce: Potential Risk to Consumers?Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Distribution and Current State of Molecular Genetic Characterization in Pathogenic Free-Living Amoebae.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Nramp: Deprive and conquer?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Culturomics revealed the bacterial constituents of the microbiota of a 10-year-old laboratory culture of planarian species S. mediterranea.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genus Sappinia comprises free-living amoebae occurring worldwide in a variety of habitats such as soils, plant matter and freshwater ponds, but also animal faeces, and includes at present three species, S. pedata, S. diploidea and S. platani. The genus is potentially pathogenic, as indicated by the identification of S. pedata in a case of human amoebic encephalitis. Electron microscopy studies on some strains already revealed intracellular bacteria in Sappinia. In the current study, we performed 16S ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) analysis of these bacterial endosymbionts. We first inferred relationships among Sappinia strains on the basis of 18S rDNA, demonstrating that S. pedata emerged as sister to a larger clade including S. diploidea, S. platani and a few 'S. diploidea-like' strains. Thus, bacterial 16S rDNA was searched for in representative strains of each Sappinia species/subgroup. We found that Sappinia strains were associated to distinct species of Flavobacterium or Pedobacter (phylum Bacteroidetes). These appear to be distributed following the amoebal host subgroups, and are not directly related to other Bacteroidetes species known as interacting with free-living amoebae. While all the endosymbionts' close relatives are known to grow on agar, bacteriological media inoculated with amoebal extracts remained negative. Overall, results indicate that the recovered bacteria are likely specific obligate endosymbionts of Sappinia species. Further studies, including additional amoebal strains and deep morphological and molecular analyses, will be necessary to confirm this hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.