Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27830365›Full record

Trial reportSurgery today2017

Haloperidol prophylaxis for preventing aggravation of postoperative delirium in elderly patients: a randomized, open-label prospective trial.

Shinji Fukata, Yasuji Kawabata, Ken Fujishiro, Yuichi Kitagawa, Kojiro Kuroiwa, Hirotoshi Akiyama, Marie Takemura, Masahiko Ando, Hideyuki Hattori

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgery today, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effects of Haloperidol on Delirium in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Antipsychotic Drugs in Prevention of Postoperative Delirium-What Is Known in 2020?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shinji FukataDepartment of Surgery, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan. fukatash@ncgg.go.jp.
Yasuji KawabataDepartment of Surgery, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan.
Ken FujishiroDepartment of Surgery, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan.
Yuichi KitagawaDepartment of Surgery, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan.
Kojiro KuroiwaDepartment of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakaecho, Itabasi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan.
Hirotoshi AkiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Marie TakemuraDepartment of Orthopedics, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430, Morioka, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan.
Masahiko AndoCenter for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, 65 Turumai, Shouwa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan.
Hideyuki HattoriDepartment of Psychiatry, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430, Morioka, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan.
National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology · JPNagoya University Hospital · JPTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the early administration haloperidol in preventing the aggravation of postoperative delirium in elderly patients.

methodsA total of 201 patients (age ≥75 years) who underwent elective surgery were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: the intervention group (n = 101) received prophylactic haloperidol (5 mg); the control group (n = 100) did not. Haloperidol was administered daily during postoperative days 0-5 to the patients who presented with NEECHAM scores of 20-24 when measured at 18:00. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe postoperative delirium.

resultsThe incidence of severe postoperative delirium in all patients was 25.1%. The incidence of severe postoperative delirium in the intervention group (18.2%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (32.0%) (p = 0.02). The difference between the two groups was larger when the analysis was limited to the 70 patients who had NEECHAM scores of 20-24 for at least one day during postoperative days 0-5. No adverse effects of the haloperidol were observed.

conclusionThe prophylactic administration of haloperidol at the early stage of delirium significantly reduced the incidence of severe postoperative delirium in elderly patients. Clinical Trial Registration UMIN000007204.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntipsychotic AgentsDeliriumElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHaloperidolHumansIncidenceMalePostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic AgentsHaloperidolElderly patientsHaloperidol prophylaxisNEECHAMOpen-label prospective trialPostoperative deliriumRandomized

Identifiers

PMID27830365
OpenAlexW2554377008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.