Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27830343›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2017

The efficacy and safety of coenzyme Q10 in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zhen-Guo Zhu, Miao-Xuan Sun, Wan-Li Zhang, Wen-Wen Wang, Yi-Mei Jin, Cheng-Long Xie

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Coenzyme QFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Neuroprotection in Parkinson Disease.Neurology and therapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Coenzyme Q10 and the Blood-Brain Barrier: An Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Understanding coenzyme Q.Physiological reviews · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. CoQNutrients · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhen-Guo ZhuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Miao-Xuan SunThe Center of Rehabilitation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 35000, China.
Wan-Li ZhangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Wen-Wen WangThe Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
Yi-Mei JinDepartment of Pediatric Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China. 69365560@qq.com.
Cheng-Long XieDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China. xiechenglong1987@sina.com.
Wenzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients in order to arrive at qualitative and quantitative conclusions about the efficacy of CoQ10. Databases searched included PubMed, Google scholar, CNKI, Wan-Fang, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 2016. We only included sham-controlled, randomized clinical trials of CoQ10 intervention for motor dysfunction in patients with PD. Relevant measures were extracted independently by two investigators. Weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated with random-effects models. Eight studies with a total of 899 patients were included. Random-effects analysis revealed a pooled WMD of 1.02, indicating no significant difference when CoQ10 treatment compared with placebo in terms of UPDRS part 3 (p = 0.54). Meanwhile, the effect size of UPDRS part 1, UPDRS part 2, and total UPDRS scores were similar in CoQ10 group with in placebo group (p > 0.05). Moreover, we found CoQ10 was well tolerated compared with placebo group. Subgroup analysis showed that the effect size of CoQ10 in monocentric studies was larger than in multicenter studies. Using the GRADE criteria, we characterized the quality of evidence presented in this meta-analysis as moderate to high level. The current meta-analysis provided evidence that CoQ10 was safe and well tolerated in participants with PD and no superior to placebo in terms of motor symptoms. According to these results, we cannot recommend CoQ10 for the routine treatment of PD right now.

Indexed as

HumansNeuroprotective AgentsOutcome Assessment, Health CareParkinson DiseaseRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUbiquinonecoenzyme Q10Neuroprotective AgentsUbiquinoneCoenzyme Q10CoQ10Meta-analysisParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID27830343
OpenAlexW2556527569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.