Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27830207›Full record

ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology2016

The role of Interactive Binocular Treatment system in amblyopia therapy.

Zhale Rajavi, Hamideh Sabbaghi, Ebrahim Amini Sharifi, Narges Behradfar, Mehdi Yaseri

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of current ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02740725 (The Role of Interactive Binocular Treatment System in Amblyopia Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02740725 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Role of Interactive Binocular Treatment System in Amblyopia Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesRan2014Enrolled50ConditionsAmblyopiaArmsPatching Therapy, Interactive Binocular Treatment System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Prospective observational study of three real-world amblyopia treatments in children: clinical outcomes and predictive factors.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhale RajaviSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamideh SabbaghiOphthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ebrahim Amini SharifiOphthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Narges BehradfarOphthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi YaseriDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the role of Interactive Binocular Treatment (I-BiT™) as a complementary method of patching in amblyopia therapy.

methodsIn this randomized clinical trial study, 50 unilateral amblyopic children (25 male/25 female) between 3 and 10 years with either best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/30 in the amblyopic eye or a difference of BCVA ≥ 2 lines between the two eyes were included. They were randomly classified into the case and control groups (25 in each). Patching was recommended in both groups, and cases also received I-BiT™. Cases were asked to play I-BiT™ games through appropriate glasses with conjugate colored filters. Moving and fixed targets were shown to the amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes, respectively. Playing games was continued 20 min in each session for 5 days a week within one month (total time: 6.6 h). Patching was continued for one month more in both groups to evaluate the continuous effect of I-BiT™. BCVA was measured at baseline, one month after beginning I-BiT™, and one month after cessation of I-BiT™.

resultsBCVA of amblyopic eyes in cases and controls were 0.34 ± 0.14 and 0.33 ± 0.17LogMAR at baseline which improved to 0.17 ± 0.14 and 0.26 ± 0.17 at one month, respectively. The difference was significant in each group (p < 0.001 for cases and p = 0.024 for controls) with more improvement in the case group (p < 0.001). One month after cessation of I-BiT™, BCVA difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. There was no case with recurrence of amblyopia.

conclusionBased on our results, I-BiT™ seems to be effective in amblyopia therapy accompanied with patching. We recommend comparing I-BiT™ alone with patching in further studies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02740725.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaInteraction Binocular Treatment (I-BiT™)Patch therapy

Identifiers

PMID27830207
PMCPMC5093783
OpenAlexW2518341403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.