ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology2016
The role of Interactive Binocular Treatment system in amblyopia therapy.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02740725 (The Role of Interactive Binocular Treatment System in Amblyopia Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Role of Interactive Binocular Treatment System in Amblyopia Therapy
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Binocular treatment for amblyopia: a systematic review.International ophthalmology · 2024Pooled it
- Computer-Assisted Visual Training in Children and Adolescents with Developmental Visual Disorders.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of interventions for amblyopia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2020Pooled it
- Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness of binocular therapy as a complementary treatment of part-time patching in older amblyopic children: a randomized clinical trial.International ophthalmology · 2023Trial
- Video Game-Based Interventions for Visual Rehabilitation in Childhood Amblyopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prospective observational study of three real-world amblyopia treatments in children: clinical outcomes and predictive factors.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Observational
- Binocular Approaches in Amblyopia Treatment Based on Dichoptic StimulationTurkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the NEIVATECH virtual reality system to improve visual function in children with anisometropic amblyopia.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Efficacy of vision therapy for unilateral refractive amblyopia in children aged 7-10 years.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Current Management of Amblyopia with New Technologies for Binocular Treatment.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Comparison between binocular therapy and patching for treatment of amblyopia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2021Review
- The Potential of Virtual Reality for Inducing Neuroplasticity in Children with Amblyopia.Journal of ophthalmology · 2020Review
- Comparison between patching and interactive binocular treatment in amblyopia: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of current ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the role of Interactive Binocular Treatment (I-BiT™) as a complementary method of patching in amblyopia therapy.
methodsIn this randomized clinical trial study, 50 unilateral amblyopic children (25 male/25 female) between 3 and 10 years with either best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/30 in the amblyopic eye or a difference of BCVA ≥ 2 lines between the two eyes were included. They were randomly classified into the case and control groups (25 in each). Patching was recommended in both groups, and cases also received I-BiT™. Cases were asked to play I-BiT™ games through appropriate glasses with conjugate colored filters. Moving and fixed targets were shown to the amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes, respectively. Playing games was continued 20 min in each session for 5 days a week within one month (total time: 6.6 h). Patching was continued for one month more in both groups to evaluate the continuous effect of I-BiT™. BCVA was measured at baseline, one month after beginning I-BiT™, and one month after cessation of I-BiT™.
resultsBCVA of amblyopic eyes in cases and controls were 0.34 ± 0.14 and 0.33 ± 0.17LogMAR at baseline which improved to 0.17 ± 0.14 and 0.26 ± 0.17 at one month, respectively. The difference was significant in each group (p < 0.001 for cases and p = 0.024 for controls) with more improvement in the case group (p < 0.001). One month after cessation of I-BiT™, BCVA difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. There was no case with recurrence of amblyopia.
conclusionBased on our results, I-BiT™ seems to be effective in amblyopia therapy accompanied with patching. We recommend comparing I-BiT™ alone with patching in further studies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02740725.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.