Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27830050›Full record

ArticleComparative cytogenetics2016

The presence of the ancestral insect telomeric motif in kissing bugs (Triatominae) rules out the hypothesis of its loss in evolutionarily advanced Heteroptera (Cimicomorpha).

Sebastián Pita, Francisco Panzera, Pablo Mora, Jesús Vela, Teresa Palomeque, Pedro Lorite

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative cytogenetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Satellitome Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A new species of the genusComparative cytogenetics · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A chromosomal analysis ofComparative cytogenetics · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastián PitaSección Genética Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Francisco PanzeraSección Genética Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Pablo MoraDepartamento de Biología Experimental, Área de Genética, Universidad de Jaén, Jaen, Spain.
Jesús VelaDepartamento de Biología Experimental, Área de Genética, Universidad de Jaén, Jaen, Spain.
Teresa PalomequeDepartamento de Biología Experimental, Área de Genética, Universidad de Jaén, Jaen, Spain.
Pedro LoriteDepartamento de Biología Experimental, Área de Genética, Universidad de Jaén, Jaen, Spain.
Universidad de Jaén · ESUniversidad de la República de Uruguay · UY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing data analysis on

Indexed as

Cimicomorphaholocentric chromosomeskissing bugsNGStelomeres(TTAGG)n

Identifiers

PMID27830050
PMCPMC5088353
OpenAlexW2520171197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.