Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27829425›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2016

Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision.

Geoffrey Keith Mitchell, Hugh Edgar Senior, Michael Peter Bibo, Blessing Makoni, Sharleen Nicole Young, John Patrick Rosenberg, Patsy Yates

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020
    Article
  12. The nurse practitioner role is ideally suited for palliative care practice: A qualitative descriptive study.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2019
    Article
  13. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geoffrey Keith MitchellDiscipline of General Practice, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Herston Rd, Herston, 4006, Queensland, Australia. g.mitchell@uq.edu.au.
Hugh Edgar SeniorDiscipline of General Practice, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Herston Rd, Herston, 4006, Queensland, Australia.
Michael Peter BiboDiscipline of General Practice, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Herston Rd, Herston, 4006, Queensland, Australia.
Blessing MakoniSouthern Cross Care, Ipswich, Australia.
Sharleen Nicole YoungDiscipline of General Practice, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Herston Rd, Herston, 4006, Queensland, Australia.
John Patrick RosenbergSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Patsy YatesSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding end of life care in rural areas is challenging. We evaluated in a pilot whether nurse practitioner (NP)-led care, including clinical care plans negotiated with involved health professionals including the general practitioner(GP), ± patient and/or carer, through a single multidisciplinary case conference (SMCC), could influence patient and health system outcomes.

methodsSetting - Australian rural district 50 kilometers from the nearest specialist palliative care service.

participantsAdults nearing the end of life from any cause, life expectancy several months. Intervention- NP led assessment, then SMCC as soon as possible after referral. A clinical care plan recorded management plans for current and anticipated problems and who was responsible for each action. Eligible patients had baseline, 1 and 3 month patient-reported assessment of function, quality of life, depression and carer stress, and a clinical record audit. Interviews with key service providers assessed the utility and feasibility of the service.

resultsSixty-two patients were referred to the service, forty from the specialist service. Many patients required immediate treatment, prior to both the planned baseline assessment and the planned SMCC (therefore ineligible for enrollment). Only six patients were assessed per protocol, so we amended the protocol. There were 23 case conferences. Reasons for not conducting the case conference included the patient approaching death, or assessed as not having immediate problems. Pain (25 %) and depression (23 %) were the most common symptoms discussed in the case conferences. Ten new advance care plans were initiated, with most patients already having one. The NP or RN made 101 follow-up visits, 169 phone calls, and made 17 referrals to other health professionals. The NP prescribed 24 new medications and altered the dose in nine. There were 14 hospitalisations in the time frame of the project. Participants were satisfied with the service, but the service cost exceeded income from national health insurance alone.

conclusionsNP-coordinated, GP supported care resulted in prompt initiation of treatment, good follow up, and a care plan where all professionals had named responsibilities. NP coordinated palliative care appears to enable more integrated care and may be effective in reducing hospitalisations.

Indexed as

General PractitionersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCaregiversFeasibility StudiesFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNurse PractitionersOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePalliative CarePilot ProjectsCase conferencesGeneral practiceNurse practitionerOrganisation of carePalliative carePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID27829425
PMCPMC5103592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.