Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27829360›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Disease gene prioritization by integrating tissue-specific molecular networks using a robust multi-network model.

Jingchao Ni, Mehmet Koyuturk, Hanghang Tong, Jonathan Haines, Rong Xu, Xiang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mapping cross-domain drivers of Alzheimer's disease risk through integrated network analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Guide to Conquer the Biological Network Era Using Graph Theory.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingchao NiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, 44106, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2986-6612
Mehmet KoyuturkDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, 44106, OH, USA.
Hanghang TongSchool of Computing, Informatics, Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S. Mill Ave., Tempe, 85281, AZ, USA.
Jonathan HainesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, 44106, OH, USA.
Rong XuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, 44106, OH, USA.
Xiang ZhangCollege of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, 332 Information Sciences and Technology Building, University Park, 16802, PA, USA. xzhang@ist.psu.edu.

Funding

Theoretical Foundations and Software Infrastructure for Biological Network DatabasesU01CA198941 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYUTURK, MEHMET · 2015 to 2017
$1.4M
Enhancing Genome-Wide Association Studies via Integrative Network AnalysisR01LM011247 · NLM · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYUTURK, MEHMET · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
Fast and Robust Methods for Large Scale Genotype Phenotype Association StudyR01GM115833 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WANG, WEI · 2015 to 2017
$933k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA198941NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115833NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurately prioritizing candidate disease genes is an important and challenging problem. Various network-based methods have been developed to predict potential disease genes by utilizing the disease similarity network and molecular networks such as protein interaction or gene co-expression networks. Although successful, a common limitation of the existing methods is that they assume all diseases share the same molecular network and a single generic molecular network is used to predict candidate genes for all diseases. However, different diseases tend to manifest in different tissues, and the molecular networks in different tissues are usually different. An ideal method should be able to incorporate tissue-specific molecular networks for different diseases.

resultsIn this paper, we develop a robust and flexible method to integrate tissue-specific molecular networks for disease gene prioritization. Our method allows each disease to have its own tissue-specific network(s). We formulate the problem of candidate gene prioritization as an optimization problem based on network propagation. When there are multiple tissue-specific networks available for a disease, our method can automatically infer the relative importance of each tissue-specific network. Thus it is robust to the noisy and incomplete network data. To solve the optimization problem, we develop fast algorithms which have linear time complexities in the number of nodes in the molecular networks. We also provide rigorous theoretical foundations for our algorithms in terms of their optimality and convergence properties. Extensive experimental results show that our method can significantly improve the accuracy of candidate gene prioritization compared with the state-of-the-art methods.

conclusionsIn our experiments, we compare our methods with 7 popular network-based disease gene prioritization algorithms on diseases from Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database. The experimental results demonstrate that our methods recover true associations more accurately than other methods in terms of AUC values, and the performance differences are significant (with paired t-test p-values less than 0.05). This validates the importance to integrate tissue-specific molecular networks for studying disease gene prioritization and show the superiority of our network models and ranking algorithms toward this purpose. The source code and datasets are available at http://nijingchao.github.io/CRstar/ .

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, GeneticAlgorithmsArea Under CurveComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDiseaseHumansOrgan SpecificityROC CurveDisease gene prioritizationNetwork of networksTissue-specific molecular networks

Identifiers

PMID27829360
PMCPMC5103411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.