Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27829000›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Gene Regulatory Network Inferences Using a Maximum-Relevance and Maximum-Significance Strategy.

Wei Liu, Wen Zhu, Bo Liao, Xiangtao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks Using the Improved Markov Blanket Discovery Algorithm.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei LiuCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, 410082, China.
Wen ZhuCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, 410082, China.
Bo LiaoCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, 410082, China.
Xiangtao ChenCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, 410082, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovering gene regulatory networks from expression data is a challenging problem in systems biology that provides valuable information on the regulatory mechanisms of cells. A number of algorithms based on computational models are currently used to recover network topology. However, most of these algorithms have limitations. For example, many models tend to be complicated because of the "large p, small n" problem. In this paper, we propose a novel regulatory network inference method called the maximum-relevance and maximum-significance network (MRMSn) method, which converts the problem of recovering networks into a problem of how to select the regulator genes for each gene. To solve the latter problem, we present an algorithm that is based on information theory and selects the regulator genes for a specific gene by maximizing the relevance and significance. A first-order incremental search algorithm is used to search for regulator genes. Eventually, a strict constraint is adopted to adjust all of the regulatory relationships according to the obtained regulator genes and thus obtain the complete network structure. We performed our method on five different datasets and compared our method to five state-of-the-art methods for network inference based on information theory. The results confirm the effectiveness of our method.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremComputational BiologyEscherichia coliGene Regulatory NetworksGenesGenes, RegulatorInformation TheoryModels, GeneticMultigene Family

Identifiers

PMID27829000
PMCPMC5102470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.