Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27828995›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Plant Responses to Brief Touching: A Mechanism for Early Neighbour Detection?

Dimitrije Markovic, Neda Nikolic, Robert Glinwood, Gulaim Seisenbaeva, Velemir Ninkovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dimitrije MarkovicDepartment of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Neda NikolicDepartment of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Robert GlinwoodDepartment of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Gulaim SeisenbaevaDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Velemir NinkovicDepartment of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In natural habitats plants can be exposed to brief and light contact with neighbouring plants. This mechanical stimulus may represent a cue that induces responses to nearby plants. However, little is known about the effect of touching on plant growth and interaction with insect herbivores. To simulate contact between plants, a soft brush was used to apply light and brief mechanical stimuli to terminal leaves of potato Solanum tuberosum L. The number of non-glandular trichomes on the leaf surface was counted on images made by light microscope while glandular trichomes and pavement cells were counted on images made under scanning electronic microscope. Volatile compounds were identified and quantified using coupled gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Treated plants changed their pattern of biomass distribution; they had lower stem mass fraction and higher branch and leaf mass fraction than untouched plants. Size, weight and number of tubers were not significantly affected. Touching did not cause trichome damage nor change their total number on touched terminal leaves. However, on primary leaves the number of glandular trichomes and pavement cells was significantly increased. Touching altered the volatile emission of treated plants; they released higher quantities of the sesquiterpenes (E)-β-caryophyllene, germacrene D-4-ol and (E)-nerolidol, and lower quantities of the terpenes (E)-ocimene and linalool, indicating a systemic effect of the treatment. The odour of touched plants was significantly less preferred by the aphids Macrosiphum euphorbiae and Myzus persicae compared to odour of untouched plants. The results suggest that light contact may have a potential role in the detection of neighbouring plants and may affect plant-insect interactions.

Indexed as

Acyclic MonoterpenesAlkenesAnimalsAphidsHerbivoryMechanotransduction, CellularMonoterpenesPlant LeavesPlant StemsPolycyclic SesquiterpenesSesquiterpenesSesquiterpenes, GermacraneSolanum tuberosumTouchTrichomesAcyclic MonoterpenesAlkenesalpha-ocimenecaryophyllenelinaloolMonoterpenesnerolidolPolycyclic SesquiterpenesSesquiterpenesSesquiterpenes, Germacrane

Identifiers

PMID27828995
PMCPMC5102373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.