Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27828876›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2017

Improving Detection of HIV-Associated Cognitive Impairment: Comparison of the International HIV Dementia Scale and a Brief Screening Battery.

Sérgio Monteiro de Almeida, Rujvi Kamat, Mariana Cherner, Anya Umlauf, Clea E Ribeiro, Ana Paula de Pereira, Donald Franklin, Robert K Heaton, Ronald J Ellis

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Female sex is strongly associated with cognitive impairment in HIV infection.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Neurocognitive Complications of HIV Infection in Low-Income Countries.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sérgio Monteiro de Almeida*Department of Virology Laboratory, Hospital de Clinicas, at Institution, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba; †Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe; Hospital Pequeno Príncipe; Department of Psychology, Department of Infectious Diseases; and ‡Department of Psychiatry and Department of Neurosciences, HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program and University of California San Diego.
Rujvi Kamat
Mariana Cherner
Anya Umlauf
Clea E Ribeiro
Ana Paula de Pereira
Donald Franklin
Robert K Heaton
Ronald J Ellis

Funding

VirologyP30AI036214 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI David Mitchell Smith · 1994 to 2026
$78.4M
STRUCTURAL NEUROIMAGING COREP30MH062512 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DAVID J MOORE · 2001 to 2026
$50.4M
Interdisciplinary Research Fellowship in NeuroAIDSR25MH081482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MARIANA CHERNER · 2007 to 2026
$5.2M
Mentoring Clinical Researchers at the Intersection of NeuroHIV and Substance AbuseK24DA040550 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHERNER, MARIANA · 2015 to 2025
$1.8M
HIV Clade on Cognitive and Neurological Disorders BrazilR21MH076651 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ELLIS, RONALD J. · 2006 to 2007
$317k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036214NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA040550NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062512NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH076651NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH081482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) was developed to screen for HIV-associated dementia, but it has been used more generally for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). This study sought to examine the accuracy of the IHDS in a cohort of Brazilian HIV-infected individuals and compare its performance to an alternative screening battery for detecting HAND.

methodsA total of 108 participants (including 60 HIV-infected persons) completed the IHDS and a gold standard neuropsychological (NP) battery of 17 tests. As alternative screening method, all possible 3-test combinations from the NP battery were examined and a superiority index (a marker of specificity and sensitivity) was calculated.

resultsSensitivity and specificity to HAND using the standard IHDS cutpoint of 10 were 36% and 75%, respectively. The best balance between sensitivity and specificity was accomplished with a modified cutpoint of 11.5, which yielded sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 58%. The top two most sensitive test combinations, compared with the gold standard NP battery, were Trail Making Test A, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III Digit Symbol and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Total Recall (sensitivity 91%, specificity 96%), and Digit Symbol, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Total Recall and Grooved Pegboard Test-dominant hand (sensitivity 94%, specificity 91%).

conclusionsBoth test combinations can be administered in less than 10 minutes and were more accurate than the IHDS in classifying HIV+ participants as NP impaired or unimpaired. These data suggest that demographically corrected T-scores from commonly used NP measures with modest time and material demands can improve identification of patients with HAND who may benefit from a more extensive NP examination.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsAdultAIDS Dementia ComplexBrazilFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsWeights and Measures

Identifiers

PMID27828876
PMCPMC5303132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.