Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27828620›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2016

PREVALENCE OF AMERICAN TRYPANOSOMIASIS AND LEISHMANIASES IN DOMESTIC DOGS IN A RURAL AREA OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF SÃO JOÃO DO PIAUÍ, PIAUÍ STATE, BRAZIL.

Taliha Dias Perez, Fabiano Borges Figueiredo, Artur Augusto Mendes Velho Junior, Valmir Laurentino Silva, Maria de Fátima Madeira, Reginaldo Peçanha Brazil, José Rodrigues Coura

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taliha Dias PerezInstituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. E-mails: talihavet@gmail.com; brazil.reginaldo@gmail.com; coura@ioc.fiocruz.br.
Fabiano Borges FigueiredoInstituto de Pesquisa Evandro Chagas (FIOCRUZ), Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em Dermatozoonoses. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. E-mails: fabiano.figueiredo@ini.fiocruz.br; artur.velho@ini.fiocruz.br.
Artur Augusto Mendes Velho JuniorInstituto de Pesquisa Evandro Chagas (FIOCRUZ), Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em Dermatozoonoses. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. E-mails: fabiano.figueiredo@ini.fiocruz.br; artur.velho@ini.fiocruz.br.
Valmir Laurentino SilvaEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública (FIOCRUZ), Setor Imunodiagnóstico do Laboratório de Pesquisa e Serviço em Saúde Pública do Departamento de Ciências Biológicas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. E-mail: valmir@ensp.fiocruz.br.
Maria de Fátima MadeiraInstituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas (FIOCRUZ), Laboratório de Vigilância em Leishmanioses. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. E-mail: fatima.madeira@ini.fiocruz.br.
Reginaldo Peçanha BrazilInstituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. E-mails: talihavet@gmail.com; brazil.reginaldo@gmail.com; coura@ioc.fiocruz.br.
José Rodrigues CouraInstituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. E-mails: talihavet@gmail.com; brazil.reginaldo@gmail.com; coura@ioc.fiocruz.br.
Instituto Evandro Chagas · BREscola Nacional de Saúde Pública · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chagas disease and the leishmaniases are endemic zoonoses of great importance to public health in the state of Piauí, Brazil. The domestic dog (Canis familiaris) is a major reservoir, host of Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania spp. in both urban and rural areas, playing an important role in the transmission of these parasites. The present study evaluated the prevalence of both infectious diseases in dogs of a rural area in the municipality of São João do Piauí, Piauí State. One hundred twenty-nine blood samples were collected for serological assessment: for the leishmaniases, 49 (38%) animals tested positive by the Dual-Path Platform technology (DPP), nine (6%) by the Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), and 19 (14.7%) by the Indirect Fluorescent Antibody test (IFA); while for American Trypanosomiasis, 36 (28%) dogs were reagent by ELISA and 21 by IFA. Of the 129 dogs sampled, 76 were submitted to xenodiagnosis, bone marrow aspiration and skin biopsy to perform parasitological tests whose results showed only one (2.3%) positive skin sample for Trypanosoma caninum and one positive xenodiagnosis for T. cruzi, both results confirmed by molecular assays. Three hundred triatomines of the species Triatoma brasiliensis and 552 phlebotomines - 509 (97%) of the species Lutzomyia longipalpis, were also captured.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrazilChagas DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDog DiseasesDogsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayLeishmaniasisPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceRural Population

Identifiers

PMID27828620
PMCPMC5096633
OpenAlexW2546668106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.