Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27827989›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2016

Activated Carbon-Based System for the Disposal of Psychoactive Medications.

Yang Song, Mahima Manian, William Fowler, Andrew Korey, Ajay Kumar Banga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yang SongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. Yang.Song@live.mercer.edu.
Mahima ManianDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. Mahima.Manian@live.mercer.edu.
William FowlerVerde Technologies, 12701 Whitewater Drive, Minnetonka, MN 55343, USA. wfowler@verdeenvirotech.com.
Andrew KoreyVerde Technologies, 12701 Whitewater Drive, Minnetonka, MN 55343, USA. akorey@verdeenvirotech.com.
Ajay Kumar BangaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. banga_ak@mercer.edu.

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201400068C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The misuse and improper disposal of psychoactive medications is a major safety and environmental concern. Hence, the proper disposal of these medications is critically important. A drug deactivation system which contains activated carbon offers a unique disposal method. In the present study, deactivation efficiency of this system was tested by using three model psychoactive drugs. HPLC validation was performed for each drug to ensure that the analytical method employed was suitable for its intended use. The method was found to be specific, accurate and precise for analyzing the drugs. The extent and rate of deactivation of the drugs was determined at several time points. After 28 days in the presence of activated carbon, the extent of leaching out of the drugs was evaluated. Deactivation started immediately after addition of the medications into the disposal pouches. Within 8 h, around 47%, 70% and 97% of diazepam, lorazepam and buprenorphine were adsorbed by the activated carbon, respectively. By the end of 28 days, over 99% of all drugs were deactivated. The desorption/leaching study showed that less than 1% of the active ingredients leached out from the activated carbon. Thus, this deactivation system can be successfully used for the disposal of psychoactive medications.

Indexed as

activated carbonadsorptionbuprenorphinedeactivationdesorptiondiazepamlorazepampsychoactive

Identifiers

PMID27827989
PMCPMC5198015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.