ArticleJournal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics2016
Differential Effects of Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept on the Viability and Wound Healing of Corneal Epithelial Cells.
Article in Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Available Therapeutic Options for Corneal Neovascularization: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Effect of Bevacizumab on the Viability and Metabolism of Human Corneal Epithelial and Endothelial Cells: An In Vitro Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Therapeutic approaches for corneal neovascularization.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study compared the effects of 3 antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept) on corneal epithelial cell viability and wound healing using human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs).
methodsTo determine the cytotoxic effects of anti-VEGF agents on HCECs, HCEC viability was determined at various concentrations of these agents. An in vitro migration assay was used to investigate the migration of HCECs treated with 3 anti-VEGF agents. The protein level of extracellular signal-regulated kinase was used to evaluate the effect of anti-VEGF treatment on cell proliferation. The protein levels of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) were analyzed by Western blotting to investigate cell migration.
resultsAfter 24 or 48 h of exposure, aflibercept treatment showed no apparent effect on cell viability; however, bevacizumab and ranibizumab treatment decreased cell viability at high concentrations (1 and 2 mg/mL). A migration assay showed that HCEC migration was different among the 3 anti-VEGF treatment groups. Bevacizumab significantly delayed HCEC migration. Western blotting showed that bevacizumab treatment decreased the expression levels of phosphorylated p38 MAPK.
conclusionsBevacizumab, the most widely used and investigated anti-VEGF agent, decreased epithelial cell migration and viability. Anti-VEGF agents other than bevacizumab might therefore be better for treating corneal neovascularization complicated with epithelial defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.