Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27827455›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

The role of water molecules in stereoselectivity of glucose/galactose-binding protein.

Minsup Kim, Art E Cho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minsup KimDepartment of Bioinformatics, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro, Sejong 339-700, Korea.
Art E ChoDepartment of Bioinformatics, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro, Sejong 339-700, Korea.
Korea University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation methods, we attempted to explain the experimental results on ligand specificity of glucose/galactose-binding protein (GGBP) to β-D-glucose and β-D-galactose. For the simulation, a three-dimensional structure of GGBP was prepared, and homology modeling was performed to generate variant structures of GGBP with mutations at Asp14. Then, docking was carried out to find a reasonable β-D-glucose and β-D-galactose binding conformations with GGBP. Subsequent molecular dynamics simulations of β-D-glucose-GGBP and β-D-galactose-GGBP complexes and estimation of the orientation and stability of water molecules at the binding site revealed how water molecules influence ligand specificity. In our simulation, water molecules mediated interactions of β-D-glucose or β-D-galactose with residue 14 of GGBP. In this mechanism, the Phe16Ala mutant leaves both sugar molecules free to move, and the specific role of water molecules were eliminated, while the wild type, Asp14Asn mutant, and Asp14Glu mutant make hydrogen bond interactions with β-D-glucose more favorable. Our results demonstrate that bound water molecules at the binding site of GGBP are related to localized conformational change, contributing to ligand specificity of GGBP for β-D-glucose over β-D-galactose.

Indexed as

Binding SitesCalcium-Binding ProteinsCrystallography, X-RayGlucoseGlucose Transport Proteins, FacilitativeHydrogen BondingModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsPeriplasmic Binding ProteinsProtein BindingProtein ConformationWaterCalcium-Binding Proteinsgalactose-binding proteinGlucoseGlucose Transport Proteins, FacilitativeMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsPeriplasmic Binding ProteinsWater

Identifiers

PMID27827455
PMCPMC5101532
OpenAlexW2552739428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.