Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27826627›Full record

ArticleDer Orthopade2017

[Complications and costs in primary knee replacement surgery in an endoprosthetics centre : Influence of state of training].

C Windisch, S Brodt, E Röhner, G Matziolis

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Orthopade, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C WindischKlinik für Orthopädie, Campus Eisenberg, Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Deutschland. c.windisch@krankenhaus-eisenberg.de.
S BrodtKlinik für Orthopädie, Campus Eisenberg, Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Deutschland.
E RöhnerKlinik für Orthopädie, Campus Eisenberg, Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Deutschland.
G MatziolisKlinik für Orthopädie, Campus Eisenberg, Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis work examines the hypothesis that in endoprosthesis implantation there are differences between experienced primary and senior caregivers (S-Op) and less experienced follow-up assistants (T-Op) with respect to process-relevant parameters. The main hypothesis is that compared to S‑Op, T‑Op cause significantly longer surgery times and thus additional operating theatre costs. As sub-hypotheses, differences in various perioperative (p-o) parameters between T‑Op and S‑Op were examined. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe status of the operator (senior and/or senior main operator [S-Op]) and/or postoperative CRP, perioperative blood loss, the amount of transfused erythrocyte concentrates, patient age, gender, ASA risk classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists), duration of surgery and blood transfusion, duration of inpatient stay, as well as the rates of early revision surgery and complications were recorded. A comparison of patients who had been operated by an S‑Op and those who had been operated by a T‑Op was made for all parameters.

resultsSignificant differences were found with respect to the duration of surgery, the duration of the hospital stay, and CRP on the third p‑o day. The T‑Op required an average of 11 min more than the S‑Op. CRP was significantly higher in the T‑Op group only on the third p‑o day, by 18 mg/l. In contrast, in the T‑Op group, a blood loss of 181 ml was lower than in the S‑Op group. This corresponded to a reduction of 0.26 transfused erythrocyte concentrates. There were no significant differences in complication rates between S‑Op and T‑Op. DISCUSSION: In the setting of a certified endoprosthetics centre, the comparison of T‑Op with S‑Op showed that the use of the former with at a non-increased complication rate led to a significant extension of the operating time. This leads to additional training costs in the amount of an estimated 3% of the current DRG remuneration. These additional costs are not represented adequately in the current remuneration system.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeClinical CompetenceEducational StatusEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleGermanyHealth Care CostsHumansIncidenceLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedDisease CostHospitaly staySurgerySurgical timeTotal Knee Replacement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.