Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27826592›Full record

ArticleBurns & trauma2016

Current knowledge of burn injury first aid practices and applied traditional remedies: a nationwide survey.

Abdullah E Kattan, Feras AlShomer, Abdulaziz K Alhujayri, Abdullah Addar, Albaraa Aljerian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Burns & trauma, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdullah E KattanPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, 37 P. O. Box 7805, Riyadh, 11472 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Feras AlShomerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, 37 P. O. Box 7805, Riyadh, 11472 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz K AlhujayriPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, 37 P. O. Box 7805, Riyadh, 11472 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah AddarPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, 37 P. O. Box 7805, Riyadh, 11472 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Albaraa AljerianPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, 37 P. O. Box 7805, Riyadh, 11472 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBurn first aid awareness has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. We present a report on the knowledge and practices of the Saudi population with regard to burn first aid and the application of traditional remedies.

methodsAn internet-based survey was conducted to assess the public's knowledge on first aid practices and home remedies applied for burn injuries among Saudi adults.

resultsA total of 2758 individuals responded to the survey. There were 1178 (42.7 %) respondents who had previously received burn first aid information. One thousand five hundred fifty respondents had a history of burn exposure in which burn injury first aid was applied as follows: 1118 (72.1 %) removed clothing and accessories from the injured area; water was applied by 990 (63.9 %); among those who applied water, 877 (88.6 %) applied cold water; and only 57 (5.8 %) did so for more than 15 min. Wrapping the burn area was performed by 526 (33.9 %), and 985 (63.5 %) sought medical assistance. When it comes to traditional remedies, 2134 (77.4 %) knew of and/or implemented these remedies as first aid or to treat burns. Honey and toothpaste were the commonest among these remedies with 1491 (69.9 %) and 1147 (53.7 %), respectively. This was associated with female gender (

conclusionsProper burn first aid is a simple, cheap, and accessible means of managing burns initially. Although the majority of the respondents were university graduates (51.1 %), knowledge and implementation of burn first aid was very poor. Major healthcare agencies should review and promote a consistent guideline for burn first aid in an effort to tackle and minimize the effect of this grave injury.

Indexed as

BurnFirst aidPracticesTraditional remedies

Identifiers

PMID27826592
PMCPMC5094133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.