Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27826504›Full record

ArticleBeilstein journal of nanotechnology2016

On the pathway of cellular uptake: new insight into the interaction between the cell membrane and very small nanoparticles.

Claudia Messerschmidt, Daniel Hofmann, Anja Kroeger, Katharina Landfester, Volker Mailänder, Ingo Lieberwirth

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Population Effects of Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles inACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia Messerschmidt *Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Daniel Hofmann *Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Anja KroegerMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Katharina LandfesterMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Volker MailänderMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Ingo LieberwirthMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For any living cell the exchange with its environment is vital. Therefore, many different kinds of cargo are able to enter cells via energy-dependent or -independent routes. Nanoparticles are no exemption. It is known that small silica nanoparticles with a diameter below 50 nm are taken up by cells and that their uptake exerts pronounced toxic effects beyond a certain concentration threshold. However, neither the exact uptake mechanism of these particles nor the actual reason for their toxicity has yet been elucidated. In this study we examined the uptake of silica nanoparticles with a diameter of 7, 12 and 22 nm by means of transmission electron microscopy, accompanied by toxicological assays. We show that for every particle diameter tested a different membrane morphology during uptake can be observed and that the amount of particles entering in one event is different for the three sizes. Silica particles with a diameter of 22 nm show single-particle internalization with a membrane wrapped around the particles in the cytosol, whereas 12 nm particles display row-like multi-particle uptake into elongated membrane structures and those with a diameter of 7 nm or less end up in tubular endocytic structures containing many particles. These membrane morphologies proved to be highly reproducible as we found them in five different cell lines. Additionally, we performed ATP and LDH assays to determine particle toxicity. Exceeding a certain concentration threshold the nanoparticles showed a high toxic potential both in the biochemical assay measurements and from morphological findings. We could not find any hint at the induction of apoptosis, neither morphologically nor biochemically. In this regard we discuss membrane damage and consumption as one possible mechanism of toxicity, linking morphological observations to toxicological findings to bridge the gap in understanding the mechanism of toxicity of small nanoparticles.

Indexed as

ATP depletioncalcium crystallizationcytotoxicityendocytosisHeLa cellsLDHmesenchymal stem cellsmorphologynecrosisparticle sizesilica nanoparticlesTEM

Identifiers

PMID27826504
PMCPMC5082453
OpenAlexW2519195432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.