Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27826449›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive care2016

Perspective on optimizing clinical trials in critical care: how to puzzle out recurrent failures.

Bruno François, Marc Clavel, Philippe Vignon, Pierre-François Laterre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Heparin - Messias or Verschlimmbesserung?Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bruno FrançoisMedical-surgical Intensive Care Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042 Limoges, France ; Inserm CIC 1435, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2531-1652
Marc ClavelMedical-surgical Intensive Care Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042 Limoges, France.
Philippe VignonMedical-surgical Intensive Care Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042 Limoges, France.
Pierre-François LaterreMedical-surgical Intensive Care Unit, Cliniques Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical care is a complex field of medicine, especially because of its diversity and unpredictability. Mortality rates of the diseases are usually high and patients are critically ill, admitted in emergency, and often have several overlapping diseases. This makes research in critical care also complex because of patients' conditions and because of the numerous ethical and regulatory requirements and increasing global competition. Many clinical trials in critical care have thus failed and almost no drug has yet been developed to treat intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Learning from the failures, clinical trials must now be optimized. MAIN BODY: Several aspects can be improved, beginning with the design of studies that should take into account patients' diversity in the ICU. At the site level, selection should reflect more accurately the potential of recruitment. Management of all players that can be involved in the research at a site level should be a priority. Moreover, training should be offered to all staff members, including the youngest. National and international networks are also part of the future as they create a collective synergy potentially improving the efficacy of sites. Finally, computerization is another area that must be further developed with the appropriate tools.

conclusionClinical research in the ICU is thus a discipline in its own right that still requires tailored approaches. Changes have to be initiated by the investigators themselves as they know all the specificities of the field.

Indexed as

Clinical researchIntensive care unitInvestigation centerPerformanceTrialsVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID27826449
PMCPMC5097421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.