Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27826234›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Dynamic Causal Modeling of Hippocampal Links within the Human Default Mode Network: Lateralization and Computational Stability of Effective Connections.

Vadim Ushakov, Maksim G Sharaev, Sergey I Kartashov, Viktoria V Zavyalova, Vitaliy M Verkhlyutov, Boris M Velichkovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vadim UshakovNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"Moscow, Russia; Department of Cybernetics, National Research Nuclear University "MEPhI"Moscow, Russia.
Maksim G SharaevNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute" Moscow, Russia.
Sergey I KartashovNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"Moscow, Russia; Department of Cybernetics, National Research Nuclear University "MEPhI"Moscow, Russia.
Viktoria V ZavyalovaNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"Moscow, Russia; Higher School of Economics, National Research UniversityMoscow, Russia.
Vitaliy M VerkhlyutovInstitute for Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Boris M VelichkovskyNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"Moscow, Russia; NBICS-Faculty, Moscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyMoscow, Russia; Faculty of Psychology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscow, Russia; Center for Cognitive Programs and Technologies, Russian State University for the HumanitiesMoscow, Russia; Applied Cognitive Research, Department of Psychology, Technische Universitaet DresdenDresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to study causal relationships between left and right hippocampal regions (LHIP and RHIP, respectively) within the default mode network (DMN) as represented by its key structures: the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and the inferior parietal cortex of left (LIPC) and right (RIPC) hemispheres. Furthermore, we were interested in testing the stability of the connectivity patterns when adding or deleting regions of interest. The functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from a group of 30 healthy right-handed subjects in the resting state were collected and a connectivity analysis was performed. To model the effective connectivity, we used the spectral Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM). Three DCM analyses were completed. Two of them modeled interaction between five nodes that included four DMN key structures in addition to either LHIP or RHIP. The last DCM analysis modeled interactions between four nodes whereby one of the main DMN structures, PCC, was excluded from the analysis. The results of all DCM analyses indicated a high level of stability in the computational method: those parts of the winning models that included the key DMN structures demonstrated causal relations known from recent research. However, we discovered new results as well. First of all, we found a pronounced asymmetry in LHIP and RHIP connections. LHIP demonstrated a high involvement of DMN activity with preponderant information outflow to all other DMN regions. Causal interactions of LHIP were bidirectional only in the case of LIPC. On the contrary, RHIP was primarily affected by inputs from LIPC, RIPC, and LHIP without influencing these or other DMN key structures. For the first time, an inhibitory link was found from MPFC to LIPC, which may indicate the subjects' effort to maintain a resting state. Functional connectivity data echoed these results, though they also showed links not reflected in the patterns of effective connectivity. We suggest that such lateralized architecture of hippocampal connections may be related to lateralization phenomena in verbal and spatial domains documented in human neurophysiology, neuropsychology, and neurolinguistics.

Indexed as

DCMdefault mode networkDynamic Causal Modeling fMRIeffective connectivityfunctional connectivityhippocampal asymmetryresting state networks

Identifiers

PMID27826234
PMCPMC5078141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.