Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27825983›Full record

ReviewMolecular and cellular neurosciences2017

Accelerating glioblastoma drug discovery: Convergence of patient-derived models, genome editing and phenotypic screening.

Eoghan O'Duibhir, Neil O Carragher, Steven M Pollard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular and cellular neurosciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eoghan O'DuibhirMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, CRUK Edinburgh Centre, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Neil O CarragherInstitute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, CRUK Edinburgh Centre, University of Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: n.carragher@ed.ac.uk.
Steven M PollardMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, CRUK Edinburgh Centre, University of Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: steven.pollard@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M018040/1Cancer Research UK 16399Cancer Research UK 17368Cancer Research UK 21992Medical Research Council MR/K017047/1Medical Research Council MR/L012766/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM) continue to face a bleak prognosis. It is critical that new effective therapeutic strategies are developed. GBM stem cells have molecular hallmarks of neural stem and progenitor cells and it is possible to propagate both non-transformed normal neural stem cells and GBM stem cells, in defined, feeder-free, adherent culture. These primary stem cell lines provide an experimental model that is ideally suited to cell-based drug discovery or genetic screens in order to identify tumour-specific vulnerabilities. For many solid tumours, including GBM, the genetic disruptions that drive tumour initiation and growth have now been catalogued. CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing technologies have recently emerged, transforming our ability to functionally annotate the human genome. Genome editing opens prospects for engineering precise genetic changes in normal and GBM-derived neural stem cells, which will provide more defined and reliable genetic models, with critical matched pairs of isogenic cell lines. Generation of more complex alleles such as knock in tags or fluorescent reporters is also now possible. These new cellular models can be deployed in cell-based phenotypic drug discovery (PDD). Here we discuss the convergence of these advanced technologies (iPS cells, neural stem cell culture, genome editing and high content phenotypic screening) and how they herald a new era in human cellular genetics that should have a major impact in accelerating glioblastoma drug discovery.

Indexed as

Gene EditingAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsDrug DiscoveryGenome, HumanGlioblastomaHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsAntineoplastic AgentsCRISPR/Cas9Genome editingGlioblastoma stem cellHCSNeural stem cellPhenotypic screening

Identifiers

PMID27825983
PMCPMC6128397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.