Observational studyAtencion primaria2017
[Variability and suitability of anti-asmathic treatment in pediatric primary health care].
Observational study in Atencion primaria, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning Algorithms-Based CT Images in Glucocorticoid Therapy in Asthma Children with Small Airway Obstruction.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyse the use patterns and the characteristics of anti-asmathic prescriptions in pediatric primary health care.
designObservational and retrospective study. LOCATION: Pediatric primary health care, Asturias, Spain.
participantsDrug prescriptions in respiratory diseases in children (<14years old) during 2011. PRINCIPAL MEASUREMENTS: Data obtained from the billing database of the Regional Health Service of Asturias and analysed by sanitary district and primary health centres, calculating the number of DDD/1.000 children/day (DHD). Clinical records audit in 6 paediatric surgeries of sanitary district V to evaluate the suitability of the drug prescriptions to the current recommendations.
resultsThe main group were bronchodilators (17.14DHD) with predominance of the inhaled route (14DHD). We observe more use of inhaled corticoids (4.83DHD), with an important use of fluticasone. We considered un-suitable 94.3% oral bronchodilators, and >50% of mepiramine prescriptions. We registered off-label prescriptions, 17.8% of them were about oral salbutamol, being used in children <2years old.
conclusionsThe use of anti-asthmatic drugs in our region is high, maybe it's related to the asthma prevalence. We observed variability between sanitary districts and health centres. The prescription patterns are closed to the current recommendation, except in the case of oral bronchodilators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.