Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27825431›Full record

ReviewSeminars in nuclear medicine2016

PET Tracers Beyond FDG in Prostate Cancer.

David M Schuster, Cristina Nanni, Stefano Fanti

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advances in PET imaging of cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Cancer research · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Healthy Tissue Uptake ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David M SchusterDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: dschust@emory.edu.
Cristina NanniDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano FantiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Emory University · USPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

uPAR Targeted in Vivo Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of....P50CA128301 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SCHUSTER, DAVID MICHAEL · 2008 to 2012
$6.8M
Molecular Imaging with FACBC PET-CT to Improve Post prostatectomy RadiotherapyR01CA169188 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JANI, ASHESH, SCHUSTER, DAVID MICHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
18F-FACBC PET-CT for the Detection and Staging of Recurrent Prostate CarcinomaR01CA129356 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SCHUSTER, DAVID MICHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA128301NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129356NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional anatomical imaging with CT and MRI has limitations in the evaluation of prostate cancer. PET is a powerful imaging technique, which can be directed toward molecular targets as diverse as glucose metabolism, density of prostate-specific membrane antigen receptors, and skeletal osteoblastic activity. Although 2-deoxy-2-

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Radioactive TracersHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsRecurrenceFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radioactive Tracers

Identifiers

PMID27825431
PMCPMC5117950
OpenAlexW2507638513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.