Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27825345›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Reconfiguring health workforce: a case-based comparative study explaining the increasingly diverse professional roles in Europe.

Antoinette de Bont, Job van Exel, Silvia Coretti, Zeynep Güldem Ökem, Maarten Janssen, Kristin Lofthus Hope, Tomasz Ludwicki, Britta Zander, Marie Zvonickova, Christine Bond and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. General practitioners' income and activity: the impact of multi-professional group practice in France.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Antoinette de BontInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands. debont@bmg.eur.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0745-4537
Job van ExelInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Silvia CorettiPostgraduate School of Health Economics and management (ALTEMS), Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore School of Economics, Milan, Italy.
Zeynep Güldem ÖkemFaculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Turkey.
Maarten JanssenInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Kristin Lofthus HopeUni Research Rokkan Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Tomasz LudwickiFaculty of Management, the University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Britta ZanderFaculty of Economics and Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Marie ZvonickovaThird Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Christine BondDivision of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.
Iris WallenburgInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
MUNROS Team

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HERU1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decade the healthcare workforce has diversified in several directions with formalised roles for health care assistants, specialised roles for nurses and technicians, advanced roles for physician associates and nurse practitioners and new professions for new services, such as case managers. Hence the composition of health care teams has become increasingly diverse. The exact extent of this diversity is unknown across the different countries of Europe, as are the drivers of this change. The research questions guiding this study were: What extended professional roles are emerging on health care teams? How are extended professional roles created? What main drivers explain the observed differences, if any, in extended roles in and between countries?

methodsWe performed a case-based comparison of the extended roles in care pathways for breast cancer, heart disease and type 2 diabetes. We conducted 16 case studies in eight European countries, including in total 160 interviews with physicians, nurses and other health care professionals in new roles and 600+ hours of observation in health care clinics.

resultsThe results show a relatively diverse composition of roles in the three care pathways. We identified specialised roles for physicians, extended roles for nurses and technicians, and independent roles for advanced nurse practitioners and physician associates. The development of extended roles depends upon the willingness of physicians to delegate tasks, developments in medical technology and service (re)design. Academic training and setting a formal scope of practice for new roles have less impact upon the development of new roles. While specialised roles focus particularly on a well-specified technical or clinical domain, the generic roles concentrate on organising and integrating care and cure.

conclusionThere are considerable differences in the number and kind of extended roles between both countries and care pathways. The main drivers for new roles reside in the technological development of medical treatment and the need for more generic competencies. Extended roles develop in two directions: 1) specialised roles and 2) generic roles.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelPatient Care TeamProfessional RoleBreast NeoplasmsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EuropeHeart DiseasesHumansWorkforceAdvanced rolesComparative studyEuropeExtended rolesHealth care teamsHealth workforceSkill mix

Identifiers

PMID27825345
PMCPMC5101691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.