Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27825215›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2016

Comparing generalized ensemble methods for sampling of systems with many degrees of freedom.

James Lincoff, Sukanya Sasmal, Teresa Head-Gordon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Best Practices for Alchemical Free Energy Calculations [Article v1.0].Living journal of computational molecular science · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James LincoffDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Sukanya SasmalDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Teresa Head-GordonDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING GRANTT32GM008295 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HURLEY, JAMES H, WEMMER, DAVID E · 1989 to 2022
$8.1M
High Accuracy Computational Methods for Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyU01GM121667 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HEAD-GORDON, MARTIN PAUL, HEAD-GORDON, TERESA L. · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008295NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM121667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compare two standard replica exchange methods using temperature and dielectric constant as the scaling variables for independent replicas against two new corresponding enhanced sampling methods based on non-equilibrium statistical cooling (temperature) or descreening (dielectric). We test the four methods on a rough 1D potential as well as for alanine dipeptide in water, for which their relatively small phase space allows for the ability to define quantitative convergence metrics. We show that both dielectric methods are inferior to the temperature enhanced sampling methods, and in turn show that temperature cool walking (TCW) systematically outperforms the standard temperature replica exchange (TREx) method. We extend our comparisons of the TCW and TREx methods to the 5 residue met-enkephalin peptide, in which we evaluate the Kullback-Leibler divergence metric to show that the rate of convergence between two independent trajectories is faster for TCW compared to TREx. Finally we apply the temperature methods to the 42 residue amyloid-β peptide in which we find non-negligible differences in the disordered ensemble using TCW compared to the standard TREx. All four methods have been made available as software through the OpenMM Omnia software consortium (http://www.omnia.md/).

Identifiers

PMID27825215
PMCPMC5097048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.