Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27824918›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Skin Vaccination against Rotavirus Using Microneedles: Proof of Concept in Gnotobiotic Piglets.

Yuhuan Wang, Anastasia Vlasova, Daniel E Velasquez, Linda J Saif, Sukumar Kandasamy, Efrat Kochba, Yotam Levin, Baoming Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Rotavirus vaccines: progress and new developments.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Current and new rotavirus vaccines.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Noninvasive vaccination against infectious diseases.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuhuan WangGastroenteritis and Respiratory Viruses Laboratory Branch Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Anastasia VlasovaFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research & Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States of America.
Daniel E VelasquezGastroenteritis and Respiratory Viruses Laboratory Branch Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Linda J SaifFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research & Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States of America.
Sukumar KandasamyFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research & Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States of America.
Efrat KochbaNanoPass Technologies Ltd., Nes Ziona, Israel.
Yotam LevinNanoPass Technologies Ltd., Nes Ziona, Israel.
Baoming JiangGastroenteritis and Respiratory Viruses Laboratory Branch Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Live-attenuated oral rotavirus (RV) vaccines have lower efficacy in low income countries, and additionally are associated with a rare but severe adverse event, intussusception. We have been pursuing the development of an inactivated rotavirus vaccine (IRV) using the human rotavirus strain CDC-9 (G1P[8]) through parenteral immunization and previously demonstrated dose sparing and enhanced immunogenicity of intradermal (ID) unadjuvanted IRV using a coated microneedle patch in comparison with intramuscular (IM) administration in mice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune response and protection against RV infection and diarrhea conferred by the administration of the ID unadjuvanted IRV using the microneedle device MicronJet600® in neonatal gnotobiotic (Gn) piglets challenged with virulent Wa G1P[8] human RV. Three doses of 5 μg IRV when administered intradermally and 5 μg IRV formulated with aluminum hydroxide [Al(OH)3] when administered intramuscularly induced comparable rotavirus-specific antibody titers of IgA, IgG, IgG avidity index and neutralizing activity in sera of neonatal piglets. Both IRV vaccination regimens protected against RV antigen shedding in stools, and reduced the cumulative diarrhea scores in the piglets. This study demonstrated that the ID and IM administrations of IRV are immunogenic and protective against RV-induced diarrhea in neonatal piglets. Our findings highlight the potential value of an adjuvant sparing effect of the IRV ID delivery route.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntibodies, ViralGerm-Free LifeInjections, IntradermalMicroinjectionsRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesSwineSwine DiseasesAntibodies, ViralRotavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID27824918
PMCPMC5100943
OpenAlexW2557144774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.