Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27824758›Full record

Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2016

Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lisa D Levine, Katheryne L Downes, Michal A Elovitz, Samuel Parry, Mary D Sammel, Sindhu K Srinivas

10 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 10 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01916681 nacompletednot on this map

Foley OR MisO for the Management of Induction (FOR MOMI) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2013 to 2015Enrolled491ConditionsDelivery, ProlongedArmsCervical Foley & Misoprostol, Misoprostol Alone, Cervical Foley Alone, Cervical Foley & Pitocin
NCT03039036 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Amniotomy Versus Delayed Amniotomy Following Foley Catheter Ripening in Nulliparous Labor Induction

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled69ConditionsLabor InductionArmsAmniotomy, Foley Catheter, Misoprostol
NCT03866772 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Labor Induction With Double Balloon Device, Oral Misoprostol and Concomitant Use of Both. Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial- IDOM Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBnai Zion Medical CenterRan2019 to 2023Enrolled250ConditionsPregnancy RelatedArmsMisoprostol Oral Tablet, double balloon device for cervical ripening
NCT03976037 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol In Combination With Foley Bulb for Labor Induction at Term: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChristiana Care Health ServicesRan2019 to 2021Enrolled216ConditionsInduction of LaborArmsMisoprostol
NCT04004845 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effect of a Labor Induction Protocol on Vaginal Delivery Rate

TypeobservationalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2021 to 2022Enrolled66ConditionsVaginal Delivery, Labor, Induced, BirthArmsCytotec, oxytocin, Cervical Foley Balloon
NCT04233008 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Length of Cook Catheter Placement and Induction of Labor: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled178ConditionsInduction of LaborArmsFoley catheter length
NCT04496908 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Early Versus Delayed Artificial Rupture of Membranes Following Foley Catheter Ripening in Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial (AROM Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorChristiana Care Health ServicesRan2020 to 2021Enrolled160ConditionsInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornArmsamniotomy, Foley Catheter, Misoprostol
NCT05262738 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Misoprostol Dosing in BMI Greater Than 30: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas at AustinRan2022 to 2023Enrolled180ConditionsPregnancy Related, Obesity, Labor Onset and Length AbnormalitiesArms50 Micrograms Vaginal Misoprostol (Intervention), 25 Micrograms Vaginal Misoprostol (Control)
NCT05404776 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Tension Versus Tension-Free Foley Balloon for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonRan2022 to 2023Enrolled279ConditionsInduced Vaginal DeliveryArmsPlacement of Foley balloon for cervical ripening with tension., Placement of Foley balloon for cervical ripening without tension.
NCT07119398 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Combination Oxytocin/Foley Versus Oxytocin Alone for Induction of Labor in Patients With Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes

TypeinterventionalSponsorEastern Virginia Medical SchoolRan2025 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsPreterm PROM (Pregnancy)ArmsOxytocin plus Foley Catheter, Oxytocin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Methods of induction of labour: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  18. Analysis of Variables that Influence the Success Rates of Induction of Labor with Misoprostol: A Retrospective Observational Study.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa D LevineMaternal and Child Health Research Program, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, and the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Women's Health Clinical Research Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Katheryne L Downes
Michal A Elovitz
Samuel Parry
Mary D Sammel
Sindhu K Srinivas

Funding

WOMENS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH CAREER DEVELOPMENTK12HD001265 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Elizabeth A Howell · 1998 to 2026
$7.5M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of four commonly used induction methods.

methodsThis randomized trial compared four induction methods: misoprostol alone, Foley alone, misoprostol-cervical Foley concurrently, and Foley-oxytocin concurrently. Women undergoing labor induction with full-term (37 weeks of gestation or greater), singleton, vertex-presenting gestations, with no contraindication to vaginal delivery, intact membranes, Bishop score 6 or less, and cervical dilation 2 cm or less were included. Women were enrolled only once during the study period. Our primary outcome was time to delivery. Neither patients nor health care providers were blinded to assigned treatment group because examinations are required for placement of all methods; however, research personnel were blinded during data abstraction. A sample size of 123 per group (n=492) was planned to compare the four groups pairwise (P≤.008) with a 4-hour reduction in delivery time considered clinically meaningful.

resultsFrom May 2013 through June 2015, 997 women were screened and 491 were randomized and analyzed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among the four treatment groups. When comparing all induction method groups, combination methods achieved a faster median time to delivery than single-agent methods (misoprostol-Foley: 13.1 hours, Foley-oxytocin: 14.5 hours, misoprostol: 17.6 hours, Foley: 17.7 hours, P<.001). When censored for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity, women who received misoprostol-Foley were almost twice as likely to deliver before women who received misoprostol alone (hazard ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-2.59) or Foley alone (hazard ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.87 1.39-2.52), whereas Foley-oxytocin was not statistically different from single-agent methods.

conclusionAfter censoring for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity, misoprostol-cervical Foley resulted in twice the chance of delivering before either single-agent method. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01916681.

Indexed as

CatheterizationLabor Stage, FirstCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLabor, InducedMisoprostolOxytocicsOxytocinParturitionPregnancyTerm BirthTime FactorsMisoprostolOxytocicsOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID27824758
PMCPMC5127406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 4 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.