Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2016
Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 10 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Foley OR MisO for the Management of Induction (FOR MOMI) Trial
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Amniotomy Versus Delayed Amniotomy Following Foley Catheter Ripening in Nulliparous Labor Induction
Labor Induction With Double Balloon Device, Oral Misoprostol and Concomitant Use of Both. Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial- IDOM Trial
Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol In Combination With Foley Bulb for Labor Induction at Term: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of a Labor Induction Protocol on Vaginal Delivery Rate
Length of Cook Catheter Placement and Induction of Labor: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Early Versus Delayed Artificial Rupture of Membranes Following Foley Catheter Ripening in Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial (AROM Trial)
Misoprostol Dosing in BMI Greater Than 30: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Tension Versus Tension-Free Foley Balloon for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Combination Oxytocin/Foley Versus Oxytocin Alone for Induction of Labor in Patients With Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Influence of Maternal Obesity on Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2019Pooled it
- A Comparison of Synthetic Osmotic Dilators and Pharmacologic Agents for Cervical Ripening in Induction of Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of midwifery & women's healthPooled it
- A randomized controlled trial of propranolol in nulliparous patients with prolonged labor.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2025Trial
- Comparison of balloon catheter, oral misoprostol, or combination of both for cervical ripening in late-term and post-term nulliparous women: A Finnish randomized controlled multicenter pilot trial.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Trial
- Association between intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus colonization and clinical chorioamnionitis among patients undergoing induction of labor at term.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Trial
- Association between intracervical Foley balloon and clinical chorioamnionitis among patients with group B streptococcus colonization undergoing induction with standardized labor management.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2023Trial
- Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Participants Undergoing Labor Induction by Cervical Ripening Method.American journal of perinatology · 2023Trial
- Controlled Release Dinoprostone Insert and Foley Compared to Foley Alone: A Randomized Pilot Trial.American journal of perinatology · 2021Trial
- Pharmacologic cervical ripening strategies and time-related outcomes: a community hospital cohort study.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Article
- BMI-Stratified Risk of Cesarean Delivery Following Labor Induction: A Robson Classification-Based Cohort Study with Predictive Modeling.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Methods of induction of labour: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Exploring the Role of Virtual Reality in Labor Induction: A Narrative Review of Benefits, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of pregnancy · 2026Review
- Predictive Factors for the Success of Vaginal Dinoprostone for the Induction of Labour.International journal of women's health · 2024Article
- A randomized controlled trial of sequential vs simultaneous use of Foley balloon catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor in nulliparous pregnant women.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Mechanical methods for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Analysis of Variables that Influence the Success Rates of Induction of Labor with Misoprostol: A Retrospective Observational Study.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022Observational
- Observational
- American College of Nurse-Midwives Clinical Bulletin Number 18: Induction of Labor.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of four commonly used induction methods.
methodsThis randomized trial compared four induction methods: misoprostol alone, Foley alone, misoprostol-cervical Foley concurrently, and Foley-oxytocin concurrently. Women undergoing labor induction with full-term (37 weeks of gestation or greater), singleton, vertex-presenting gestations, with no contraindication to vaginal delivery, intact membranes, Bishop score 6 or less, and cervical dilation 2 cm or less were included. Women were enrolled only once during the study period. Our primary outcome was time to delivery. Neither patients nor health care providers were blinded to assigned treatment group because examinations are required for placement of all methods; however, research personnel were blinded during data abstraction. A sample size of 123 per group (n=492) was planned to compare the four groups pairwise (P≤.008) with a 4-hour reduction in delivery time considered clinically meaningful.
resultsFrom May 2013 through June 2015, 997 women were screened and 491 were randomized and analyzed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among the four treatment groups. When comparing all induction method groups, combination methods achieved a faster median time to delivery than single-agent methods (misoprostol-Foley: 13.1 hours, Foley-oxytocin: 14.5 hours, misoprostol: 17.6 hours, Foley: 17.7 hours, P<.001). When censored for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity, women who received misoprostol-Foley were almost twice as likely to deliver before women who received misoprostol alone (hazard ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-2.59) or Foley alone (hazard ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.87 1.39-2.52), whereas Foley-oxytocin was not statistically different from single-agent methods.
conclusionAfter censoring for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity, misoprostol-cervical Foley resulted in twice the chance of delivering before either single-agent method. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01916681.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.