ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2016
Treatment Decisions at the Time of Miscarriage Diagnosis.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medical management of early pregnancy loss is cost-effective compared with office uterine aspiration.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of Mifepristone Pretreatment for the Medical Management of Nonviable Early Pregnancy: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Mifepristone Pretreatment for the Medical Management of Early Pregnancy Loss.The New England journal of medicine · 2018Trial
- Perceived satisfaction in fetal therapy: proposal and pilot of a novel assessment tool (FETAL Surgery Global Satisfaction).BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Medication Management of Early Pregnancy Loss in an Urban Texas Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- "Just Stay Home and Wait It Out": Exploring Challenges Accessing Care for Miscarriage in Indiana.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2026Article
- What good emotional care for miscarriage looks like: A mixed-methods investigation in an Australian private hospital setting.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025Article
- Abortion Restrictions Threaten Miscarriage Management In The United States.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2024Article
- Toward Optimal Emotional Care During the Experience of Miscarriage: An Integrative Review of the Perspectives of Women, Partners, and Health Care Providers.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2023Review
- A retrospective study of estrogen in the pretreatment for medical management of early pregnancy loss and the inference from intrauterine adhesion.European journal of medical research · 2022Article
- Review
- Factors affecting the emotional wellbeing of women and men who experience miscarriage in hospital settings: a scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Emergency Medicine Clinician Experiences Addressing Uncertainty in First-Trimester Bleeding.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- The burden of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) on providers and patients experiencing early pregnancy loss: A commentary.Contraception · 2021Article
- A Multidisciplinary, Family-Oriented Approach to Caring for Parents After Miscarriage: The Integrated Behavioral Health Model of Care.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- The association of euploid miscarriage with obesity.F&S reports · 2020Article
- Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study.BMC women's health · 2020Article
- Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2019Article
- PURL: Early pregnancy loss: Pretreat with mifepristone?The Journal of family practice · 2019Article
- Resumption of sexual intercourse post partum and the utilisation of contraceptive methods in China: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the factors patients and physicians prioritize during first-trimester miscarriage management and assess what drives satisfaction with care.
methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study of clinically stable women seeking surgical, medical, or expectant miscarriage treatment. Women with first-trimester fetal demise or anembryonic gestation (N=55) completed demographic and psychosocial surveys. Using purposive sampling, 45 (82%) completed in-depth interviews. Fifteen obstetricians were interviewed. Participants described factors that informed their counseling (physicians) or decision-making (patients). Content analysis used an integrated approach with inductively and deductively derived codes. Patient-derived themes were stratified by treatment choice. Associations between variables and treatment choices were analyzed.
resultsThirty-four women (62%) received surgical management, 19 (35%) received medical, and two (4%) received expectant. Physicians expected that women with prior pregnancies have strong management preferences, and indeed, multigravid patients were less likely to change their initial treatment choice after counseling than primigravid patients (12% compared with 42%, odds ratio [OR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.81, P=.03). Physicians favored patient-centered decisions and patients chose the treatment that they thought would least affect other responsibilities. Those ultimately receiving surgical management had a higher monthly income (adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.63, P=.023) and more social support (adjusted OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.07-5.61, P=.035) than the medical group. The surgical group cited loss acceptance, a favorable perception of surgery, and a desire to expedite the miscarriage as decisive factors. The medical group endorsed control over, and timed completion of, the miscarriage in a more intimate setting, an aversion to surgery or anesthesia, and a perception of improved fertility preservation as decisive factors. Regardless of treatment choice, satisfaction with treatment was linked to a supportive clinical team and expeditious resolution.
conclusionPrior pregnancy experiences, obligations, and sociodemographic factors influence miscarriage management decision-making. Structured counseling, especially for primigravid patients, could improve both the physician and the patient experience with miscarriage care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.