Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27824749›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2016

Treatment Decisions at the Time of Miscarriage Diagnosis.

Courtney A Schreiber, Veronica Chavez, Paul G Whittaker, Sarah J Ratcliffe, Ebony Easley, Frances K Barg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Medication Management of Early Pregnancy Loss in an Urban Texas Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. PURL: Early pregnancy loss: Pretreat with mifepristone?The Journal of family practice · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Courtney A SchreiberPenn Family Planning and Pregnancy Loss Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, and the Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Veronica Chavez
Paul G Whittaker
Sarah J Ratcliffe
Ebony Easley
Frances K Barg
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness of Pregnancy Failure Management Regimens (Pre-Fai-R)R01HD071920 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHREIBER, COURTNEY A. · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the factors patients and physicians prioritize during first-trimester miscarriage management and assess what drives satisfaction with care.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study of clinically stable women seeking surgical, medical, or expectant miscarriage treatment. Women with first-trimester fetal demise or anembryonic gestation (N=55) completed demographic and psychosocial surveys. Using purposive sampling, 45 (82%) completed in-depth interviews. Fifteen obstetricians were interviewed. Participants described factors that informed their counseling (physicians) or decision-making (patients). Content analysis used an integrated approach with inductively and deductively derived codes. Patient-derived themes were stratified by treatment choice. Associations between variables and treatment choices were analyzed.

resultsThirty-four women (62%) received surgical management, 19 (35%) received medical, and two (4%) received expectant. Physicians expected that women with prior pregnancies have strong management preferences, and indeed, multigravid patients were less likely to change their initial treatment choice after counseling than primigravid patients (12% compared with 42%, odds ratio [OR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.81, P=.03). Physicians favored patient-centered decisions and patients chose the treatment that they thought would least affect other responsibilities. Those ultimately receiving surgical management had a higher monthly income (adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.63, P=.023) and more social support (adjusted OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.07-5.61, P=.035) than the medical group. The surgical group cited loss acceptance, a favorable perception of surgery, and a desire to expedite the miscarriage as decisive factors. The medical group endorsed control over, and timed completion of, the miscarriage in a more intimate setting, an aversion to surgery or anesthesia, and a perception of improved fertility preservation as decisive factors. Regardless of treatment choice, satisfaction with treatment was linked to a supportive clinical team and expeditious resolution.

conclusionPrior pregnancy experiences, obligations, and sociodemographic factors influence miscarriage management decision-making. Structured counseling, especially for primigravid patients, could improve both the physician and the patient experience with miscarriage care.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionAbortifacient AgentsAbortion, SpontaneousAbortion, TherapeuticAdolescentAdultDirective CounselingFemaleGravidityHumansIncomeInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedAbortifacient Agents

Identifiers

PMID27824749
PMCPMC5121058
OpenAlexW2549992434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.