Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27824257›Full record

Trial reportHealth communication2017

Offline Social Relationships and Online Cancer Communication: Effects of Social and Family Support on Online Social Network Building.

Kang Namkoong, Dhavan V Shah, David H Gustafson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health communication, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Symptom clusters and impact on quality of life in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kang Namkoonga Department of Community and Leadership Development , University of Kentucky.
Dhavan V Shahb School of Journalism and Mass Communication , University of Wisconsin-Madison.
David H Gustafsonc Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies , University of Wisconsin-Madison.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Using Technology to Enhance Cancer Communication and Improve Clinical OutcomesP50CA095817 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H · 2003 to 2012
$19.3M
Heart-Related Multiple Chronic Conditions in Primary Care: Behavioral TechnologyR01HL134146 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H, MAHONEY, JANE E · 2017 to 2021
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095817NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL134146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates how social support and family relationship perceptions influence breast cancer patients' online communication networks in a computer-mediated social support (CMSS) group. To examine social interactions in the CMSS group, we identified two types of online social networks: open and targeted communication networks. The open communication network reflects group communication behaviors (i.e., one-to-many or "broadcast" communication) in which the intended audience is not specified; in contrast, the targeted communication network reflects interpersonal discourses (i.e., one-to-one or directed communication) in which the audience for the message is specified. The communication networks were constructed by tracking CMSS group usage data of 237 breast cancer patients who participated in one of two National Cancer Institute-funded randomized clinical trials. Eligible subjects were within 2 months of a diagnosis of primary breast cancer or recurrence at the time of recruitment. Findings reveal that breast cancer patients who perceived less availability of offline social support had a larger social network size in the open communication network. In contrast, those who perceived less family cohesion had a larger targeted communication network in the CMSS group, meaning they were inclined to use the CMSS group for developing interpersonal relationships.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationSocial NetworkingSocial SupportBreast NeoplasmsFamilyFemaleHumansInternetMiddle AgedSelf-Help Groups

Identifiers

PMID27824257
PMCPMC6095462
OpenAlexW2556382737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.