Trial reportAIDS research and human retroviruses2017
A Comparative Pre-Phase I Study of the Impact of Gel Vehicle Volume on Distal Colon Distribution, User Experience, and Acceptability.
Trial report in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Acceptability of a Tenofovir Rectal Microbicide Douche Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men: The DREAM ATN Study (ATN 163).The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Anal Sex and Tenofovir Douche Sequence Impacts Colorectal Distribution of HIV Surrogate and Douche: DREAM-02.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Mapping Colorectal Distribution of Cell-free and Cell-associated HIV Surrogates Following Simulated Anal Intercourse to Aid Rectal Microbicide Development.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2024Article
- Acceptability of PC-1005 Gel Administered Rectally to HIV-1 Seronegative Adults at Three Different Volume Levels (MTN-037).AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2022Article
- Designing Dual Compartment HIV Prevention Products: Women's Sensory Perceptions and Experiences of Suppositories for Rectal and Vaginal Use.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2022Article
- Acceptability of a Dapivirine/Placebo Gel Administered Rectally to HIV-1 Seronegative Adults (MTN-026).AIDS and behavior · 2022Article
- Pharmaceutical Approaches to HIV Treatment and Prevention.Advanced therapeutics · 2018Article
- Article
- On-demand microbicide products: design matters.Drug delivery and translational research · 2017Review
- User input in iterative design for prevention product development: leveraging interdisciplinary methods to optimize effectiveness.Drug delivery and translational research · 2017Article
- Designing and developing suppository formulations for anti-HIV drug delivery.Therapeutic delivery · 2017Review
- Lubricant Provides Poor Rectal Mucosal HIV Coverage.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For persons at risk of HIV infection who practice receptive anal intercourse (RAI), topical rectal microbicides represent a promising option for coitally dependent protection. The study compared colorectal distribution and user sensory experiences of two different volumes of rectal gel for suitability as rectal microbicide. Eight HIV-negative men with a history of recent RAI were enrolled into a two-period, sequence-randomized dosing study comparing 3.5 and 10 ml of radiolabeled (1 mCi
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.