Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27823971›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Combined use of susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion weighted imaging to improve the accuracy of the differential diagnosis of recurrence and radionecrosis in high-grade glioma patients.

Tae-Hyung Kim, Tae Jin Yun, Chul-Kee Park, Tae Min Kim, Ji-Hoon Kim, Chul-Ho Sohn, Jae Kyung Won, Sung-Hye Park, Il Han Kim, Seung Hong Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of brain glioma before postoperative radiotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tae-Hyung KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae Jin YunDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chul-Kee ParkDepartment of Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae Min KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Hoon KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chul-Ho SohnDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Kyung WonDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Hye ParkDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Il Han KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Hong ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose was to assess predictive power for overall survival (OS) and diagnostic performance of combination of susceptibility-weighted MRI sequences (SWMRI) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) for differentiation of recurrence and radionecrosis in high-grade glioma (HGG). We enrolled 51 patients who underwent radiation therapy or gamma knife surgeryfollowed by resection for HGG and who developed new measurable enhancement more than six months after complete response. The lesions were confirmed as recurrence (n = 32) or radionecrosis (n = 19). The mean and each percentile value from cumulative histograms of normalized CBV (nCBV) and proportion of dark signal intensity on SWMRI (proSWMRI, %) within enhancement were compared. Multivariate regression was performed for the best differentiator. The cutoff value of best predictor from ROC analysis was evaluated. OS was determined with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Recurrence showed significantly lower proSWMRI and higher mean nCBV and 90th percentile nCBV (nCBV90) than radionecrosis. Regression analysis revealed both nCBV90 and proSWMRI were independent differentiators. Combination of nCBV90 and proSWMRI achieved 71.9% sensitivity (23/32), 100% specificity (19/19) and 82.3% accuracy (42/51) using best cut-off values (nCBV90 > 2.07 and proSWMRI≤15.76%) from ROC analysis. In subgroup analysis, radionecrosis with nCBV > 2.07 (n = 5) showed obvious hemorrhage (proSWMRI > 32.9%). Patients with nCBV90 > 2.07 and proSWMRI≤15.76% had significantly shorter OS. In conclusion, compared with DSC PWI alone, combination of SWMRI and DSC PWI have potential to be prognosticator for OS and lower false positive rate in differentiation of recurrence and radionecrosis in HGG who develop new measurable enhancement more than six months after complete response.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveBrain NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGliomaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedKaplan-Meier EstimateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiation InjuriesROC Curvedynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imagingmagnetic resonance imagingradionecrosis, recurrencesusceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences

Identifiers

PMID27823971
PMCPMC5386766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.