Trial reportAnnals of emergency medicine2017
Optimal Volume of Administration of Intranasal Midazolam in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Annals of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimal Volumes of Administration for Intranasal Midazolam in Children
Comparison of Two Methods Using Intranasal Lidocaine to Alleviate Discomfort Associated With Administration of Intranasal Midazolam in Children.
Dose-Finding Study of Intranasal Midazolam for Procedural Sedation in Children
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as a standard of care for pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure: a randomized controlled trial.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025Trial
- Combined use of intranasal Dexmedetomidine and an oral novel formulation of Midazolam for sedation of young children during brain MRI examination: a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Trial
- Intranasal ketorolac versus intravenous ketorolac for treatment of migraine headaches in children: A randomized clinical trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022Trial
- Design and In Vitro Evaluation of Cyclodextrin-Functionalized Albumin Nanoparticles for Intranasal Carbamazepine Brain Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Comparing the Costs Associated with Anxiolytic Agents for Reducing Distress in Children Undergoing Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- Incidence and predictors of nonresponse to intranasal midazolam in children undergoing laceration repair.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Article
- Anxiolysis for laceration repair in children: study protocol for an open-label multicenter adaptive trial (ALICE).PloS one · 2025Article
- Intranasal delivery of iron chelators and management of central nervous system disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Pediatric Status Epilepticus: Treat Early and Avoid Delays.Paediatric drugs · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Intranasal Midazolam for Pediatric Sedation during the Suturing of Traumatic Lacerations: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Comparison of preadministered and coadministered lidocaine for treating pain and distress associated with intranasal midazolam administration in children: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020Article
- Essential pharmacologic options for acute pain management in the emergency setting.Turkish journal of emergency medicine · 2019Review
- Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: A single-blind randomized trial.Turkish journal of emergency medicineArticle
- In vitro activity of cysteamine against SARS-CoV-2 variants.Molecular genetics and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveThe optimal intranasal volume of administration for achieving timely and effective sedation in children is unclear. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes relevant to procedural sedation associated with using escalating volumes of administration to administer intranasal midazolam.
methodsWe conducted a randomized, single-blinded, 3-arm, superiority clinical trial. Children aged 1 to 7 years and undergoing laceration repair requiring 0.5 mg/kg intranasal midazolam (5 mg/mL) were block-randomized to receive midazolam using 1 of 3 volumes of administration: 0.2, 0.5, or 1 mL. Procedures were videotaped, with outcome assessors blinded to volume of administration. Primary outcome was time to onset of minimal sedation (ie, score of 1 on the University of Michigan Sedation Scale). Secondary outcomes included procedural distress, time to procedure start, deepest level of sedation achieved, adverse events, and clinician and caregiver satisfaction.
resultsNinety-nine children were enrolled; 96 were analyzed for the primary outcome and secondary outcomes, except for the outcome of procedural distress, for which only 90 were analyzed. Time to onset of minimal sedation for each escalating volume of administration was 4.7 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8 to 5.4 minutes), 4.3 minutes (95% CI 3.9 to 4.9 minutes), and 5.2 minutes (95% CI 4.6 to 7.0 minutes), respectively. There were no differences in secondary outcomes except for clinician satisfaction with ease of administration: fewer clinicians were satisfied when using a volume of administration of 0.2 mL.
conclusionThere was a slightly shorter time to onset of minimal sedation when a volume of administration of 0.5 mL was used compared with 1 mL, but all 3 volumes of administration produced comparable clinical outcomes. Fewer clinicians were satisfied with ease of administration with a volume of administration of 0.2 mL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.