Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822968›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2016

Towards interprofessional networking in medication management of the aged: current challenges and potential solutions in Finland.

Sonja Kallio, Anne Kumpusalo-Vauhkonen, Timo Järvensivu, Antti Mäntylä, Marika Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä, Marja Airaksinen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How Physicians Renew Electronic Prescriptions in Primary Care: Therapeutic Decision or Technical Task?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Medication Risk Management in Routine Dispensing in Community Pharmacies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sonja Kallioa Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy , University of Helsinki , Finland.
Anne Kumpusalo-Vauhkonenb Finnish Medicines Agency, KUOPIO , Finland.
Timo Järvensivuc Department of Marketing , Aalto University School of Business, HELSINKI , Finland.
Antti Mäntyläb Finnish Medicines Agency, KUOPIO , Finland.
Marika Pohjanoksa-Mäntyläa Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy , University of Helsinki , Finland.
Marja Airaksinena Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy , University of Helsinki , Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIFinnish Medicines Agency Fimea · FIAalto University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Finnish Medicines Agency (Fimea) initiated a programme in 2012 for enhancing interprofessional networking in the medication management of the aged. The goal is to develop national guidelines for interprofessional collaboration with respect to medication management. This study aims to explore the challenges and potential solutions experienced by existing health care teams in managing medication of the aged: (1) at the individual and team level (micro level), (2) organisational level (meso level) and (3) structural level (macro level).

designGroup discussions (n = 10), pair (n = 3) and individual interviews (n = 2). Abductive content analysis combining data and theory was applied. Networking was used as a theoretical framework.

settingMeetings (n = 15) organised by Fimea in the formation phase of the interprofessional network in 2012. SUBJECTS: Health care professionals (n = 55).

main outcome measuresChallenges and solutions in the medication management of the aged at the micro, meso and macro levels.

resultsChallenges in interprofessional collaboration, problems with patient record systems, and the organisation of work and lack of resources were present at all the levels contributing to patients' medication problems. Participants suggested multiple potential solutions to improve interprofessional collaboration, sharing of tasks and responsibilities, better exploitation of pharmaceutical knowledge and developing tools as being the most commonly mentioned.

conclusionsOptimising medication use of the aged requires new systemic solutions within and between different system levels. The main challenges can be solved by clarifying responsibilities, enhancing communication and applying operational models that involve pharmacists and the use of information technology in medication management. KEY POINTS An interprofessional team approach has been suggested as a solution to promote rational medicine use among the aged. Fragmented health care system and lack of coordinated patient care are reasons for medication related problems of the aged. Challenges in the implementation of interprofessional collaboration in medication management appear in legislation, information systems, operational models and individuals' attitudes. Optimising medications requires better interprofessional networking and new systemic solutions within and between macro, meso and micro levels.

Indexed as

CommunicationCooperative BehaviorDelivery of Health CareDrug PrescriptionsHealth PersonnelHealth Services for the AgedInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamCase ManagementFinlandHumansPharmacistsQualitative ResearchagedFinlandgeneral practiceinterprofessional collaborationMedication managementnetworkingnetwork management

Identifiers

PMID27822968
PMCPMC5217280
OpenAlexW2554028917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.