SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2016
Cell-based therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell-based therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Symptomatic treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Cell-based therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for motor neuron diseases or related disorders using the AGREE II instrument.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Cellular and molecular imaging for stem cell tracking in neurological diseases.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2021Review
- Regenerative Cell-Based Therapies: Cutting Edge, Bleeding Edge, and Off the Edge.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2020Article
- Results from Phase I Clinical Trial with Intraspinal Injection of Neural Stem Cells in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Long-Term Outcome.Stem cells translational medicine · 2019Article
- Repeated Intrathecal Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Annals of neurology · 2018Article
- Advances, challenges and future directions for stem cell therapy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2017Review
- n-butylidenephthalide treatment prolongs life span and attenuates motor neuron loss in SOD1CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which is also known as motor neuron disease (MND) is a fatal disease associated with rapidly progressive disability, for which no definitive treatment as yet exists. Current treatment regimens largely focus on relieving symptoms to improve the quality of life of those affected. Based on data from preclinical studies, cell-based therapy is a promising treatment for ALS/MND.
objectivesTo assess the effects of cell-based therapy for people with ALS/MND, compared with placebo or no additional treatment. SEARCH
methodsOn 21 June 2016, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We also searched two clinical trials' registries for ongoing or unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and cluster RCTs that assigned people with ALS/MND to receive cell-based therapy versus a placebo or no additional treatment. Co-interventions were allowable, provided that they were given to each group equally. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN
resultsNo studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. We identified four ongoing trials. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCurrently, there is a lack of high-quality evidence to guide practice on the use of cell-based therapy to treat ALS/MND.We need large, prospective RCTs to establish the efficacy of cellular therapy and to determine patient-, disease- and cell treatment-related factors that may influence the outcome of cell-based therapy. The major goals of future research should be to determine the appropriate cell source, phenotype, dose, and route of delivery, as these will be key elements in designing an optimal cell-based therapy programme for people with ALS/MND. Future research should also explore novel treatment strategies, including combinations of cellular therapy and standard or novel neuroprotective agents, to find the best possible approach to prevent or reverse the neurological deficit in ALS/MND, and to prolong survival in this debilitating and fatal condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.