Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822904›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2017

A new prognostic strategy for adult patients with acute pulmonary embolism eligible for outpatient therapy.

Federico Angriman, Fernando J Vazquez, Pierre Marie Roy, Gregoire Le Gal, Marc Carrier, Esteban Gandara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A New Model for Risk Stratification of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Federico AngrimanHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Fernando J VazquezInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pierre Marie RoyDépartement de médecine d'urgences, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Gregoire Le GalThrombosis Program, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa-The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Marc CarrierThrombosis Program, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa-The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Esteban GandaraThrombosis Program, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa-The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada. egandara@ohri.ca.
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · ARUniversity of Ottawa · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FROttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to derive a parsimonious predictive model to identify a subgroup of patients that will experience a low number of adverse events within 14 days of the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Retrospective cohort study of adult patients with acute pulmonary embolism at the Ottawa Hospital between 2007 and 2012. Primary outcome was defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding within 14 days. Multivariate logistic regression models were fit to model the occurrence of the primary outcome so as to guide either outpatient therapy or early discharge after initial admission. Calibration and discrimination were assessed in both the derivation and internal validation cohorts. 1143 patients were included, of whom 42% were treated as outpatients. At pulmonary embolism diagnosis, final score to predict the primary outcome included age, malignancy, intravenous drug or oxygen requirement and systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.84) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.89) in the derivation and validation cohorts respectively. Conversely, final score to predict primary outcome after initial admission included age, malignancy, intravenous drug requirement and systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg (AUC: 0.70 (95% CI 0.64-0.76) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.79) in the derivation and validation cohorts). We have developed two simple clinical scores that may identify patients with pulmonary embolism at low risk of clinically meaningful outcomes during the first 14 days of follow up.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAmbulatory CareCohort StudiesFemaleHemorrhageHumansMalePrognosisPulmonary EmbolismRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsVenous ThromboembolismOutpatientPrognosisPulmonary embolismVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID27822904
OpenAlexW2552543646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.