ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2017
Targeting CXCR4 and FAK reverses doxorubicin resistance and suppresses invasion in non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breaking senescence restriction: MAFK-AREG axis promotes NSCLC cells to resist doxorubicin.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- A review of deep learning-based multimodal data integration of lung cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- CXCR4/CXCL12 blockade therapy; a new horizon in TNBC therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- The Impact of Pdcd4, a Translation Inhibitor, on Drug Resistance.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Synergistic anticancer effects of SMYD2 inhibitor BAY-598 and doxorubicin in non-small cell lung cancer.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Immunofluorescence-Based Assay for High-Throughput Analysis of Multidrug Resistance Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patient-Derived Cells.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Is there any prognostic significance in pleural involvement and/or effusion in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Focal adhesion kinase: from biological functions to therapeutic strategies.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- ELF3 promotes gemcitabine resistance through PKMYT1/CDK1 signaling pathway in gallbladder cancer.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Lipopolyplex-Mediated Co-Delivery of Doxorubicin and FAK siRNA to Enhance Therapeutic Efficiency of Treating Colorectal Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Therapeutic Perspectives of HIV-Associated Chemokine Receptor (CCR5 and CXCR4) Antagonists in Carcinomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Article
- Combined effects of pioglitazone and doxorubicin on migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2022Article
- Non-invasive prognostic biomarker of lung cancer patients with brain metastases: Recurrence quantification analysis of heart rate variability.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Thoracic CT radiomics analysis for predicting synchronous brain metastasis in patients with lung cancer.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022Article
- FAK inhibitors as promising anticancer targets: present and future directions.Future medicinal chemistry · 2021Review
- CXCR4 blockade sensitizes osteosarcoma to doxorubicin by inducing autophagic cell death via PI3K‑Akt‑mTOR pathway inhibition.International journal of oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- VASH2 Promotes Cell Proliferation and Resistance to Doxorubicin in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer via AKT Signaling.Oncology research · 2020Article
- The roles of nuclear focal adhesion kinase (FAK) on Cancer: a focused review.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent high lung cancer mortality rates are mainly due to the occurrence of metastases and therapeutic resistance. Therefore, simultaneous targeting of these processes may be a valid approach for the treatment of this type of cancer. Here, we assessed relationships between CXC chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) gene expression levels and expression levels of the drug resistance-related genes ABCB1 and ABCC1, and tested the potential of CXCR4 and FAK inhibitors to reverse doxorubicin (DOX) resistance and to decrease the invasive capacity of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cells.
methodsqRT-PCR was used for gene expression analyses in primary lung tissue samples obtained from 30 NSCLC patients and the human NSCLC-derived cell lines NCI-H460, NCI-H460/R and COR-L23. MTT, flow cytometry, cell death and β-galactosidase activity assays were used to assess the in vitro impact of CXCR4 and FAK inhibitors on DOX sensitivity. In addition, invasion and gelatin degradation assays were used to assess the in vitro impact of the respective inhibitors on metastasis-related processes in combination with DOX treatment.
resultsWe found that ABCB1 over-expression was significantly associated with CXCR4 and FAK over-expression, whereas ABCC1 over-expression was associated with increased FAK expression. We also found that CXCR4 and FAK inhibitors strongly synergized with DOX in reducing cell viability, arresting the cell cycle in the S or G
conclusionsFrom our data we conclude that targeting of CXCR4 and FAK may overcome ABCB1 and ABCC1-dependent DOX resistance in NSCLC cells and that simultaneous treatment of these cells with DOX may potentiate the anti-invasive effects of CXCR4 and FAK inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.