Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822652›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Utility of oropharyngeal real-time PCR for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae for diagnosis of pneumonia in adults.

A Bjarnason, M Lindh, J Westin, L-M Andersson, O Baldursson, K G Kristinsson, M Gottfredsson

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Simultaneous Genetically Detection ofIranian journal of pathology · 2023
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Respiratory viral infections are underdiagnosed in patients with suspected sepsis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A BjarnasonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Vatnsmyrarvegi 16, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland.
M LindhDepartment of Infectious Diseases/Clinical Virology, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 3a-5b, 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J WestinDepartment of Infectious Diseases/Clinical Virology, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 3a-5b, 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden.
L-M AnderssonDepartment of Infectious Diseases/Clinical Virology, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 3a-5b, 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden.
O BaldurssonDepartments of Medicine, Microbiology and Virology, Landspitali University Hospital, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland.
K G KristinssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Vatnsmyrarvegi 16, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland.
M GottfredssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Vatnsmyrarvegi 16, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland. magnusgo@landspitali.is.
University of Gothenburg · SENational University Hospital of Iceland · ISUniversity of Iceland · IS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lack of sensitive tests and difficulties obtaining representative samples contribute to the challenge in identifying etiology in pneumonia. Upper respiratory tract swabs can be easily collected and analyzed with real-time PCR (rtPCR). Common pathogens such as S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae can both colonize and infect the respiratory tract, complicating the interpretation of positive results. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected (n = 239) prospectively from adults admitted to hospital with pneumonia. Analysis with rtPCR targeting S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae was performed and results compared with sputum cultures, blood cultures, and urine antigen testing for S. pneumoniae. Different Ct cutoff values were applied to positive tests to discern colonization from infection. Comparing rtPCR with conventional testing for S. pneumoniae in patients with all tests available (n = 57) resulted in: sensitivity 87 %, specificity 79 %, PPV 59 % and NPV 94 %, and for H. influenzae (n = 67): sensitivity 75 %, specificity 80 %, PPV 45 % and NPV 94 %. When patients with prior antimicrobial exposure were excluded sensitivity improved: 92 % for S. pneumoniae and 80 % for H. influenzae. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated for S. pneumoniae: AUC = 0.65 (95 % CI 0.51-0.80) and for H. influenzae: AUC = 0.86 (95 % CI 0.72-1.00). Analysis of oropharyngeal swabs using rtPCR proved both reasonably sensitive and specific for diagnosing pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. This method may be a useful diagnostic adjunct to other methods and of special value in patients unable to provide representative lower airway samples.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHaemophilus influenzaeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesOropharynxPneumonia, BacterialPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityStreptococcus pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID27822652
PMCPMC5309271
OpenAlexW2553771384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.