Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822619›Full record

ReviewPain and therapy2016

The 5% Lidocaine-Medicated Plaster: Its Inclusion in International Treatment Guidelines for Treating Localized Neuropathic Pain, and Clinical Evidence Supporting its Use.

Ralf Baron, Massimo Allegri, Gerardo Correa-Illanes, Guy Hans, Michael Serpell, Gerard Mick, Victor Mayoral

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Pain in the Cancer Survivor.Cancer treatment and research · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Ralf BaronDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany. r.baron@neurologie.uni-kiel.de.
Massimo AllegriPain Therapy Service, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Parma Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Gerardo Correa-IllanesRehabilitation Department, Hospital del Trabajador de Asociación Chilena de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile.
Guy HansMultidisciplinary Pain Centre, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegum, Belgium.
Michael SerpellUniversity Department of Anaesthesia, Pain Research Office, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Gerard MickCentre for Pain Evaluation and Treatment, University Neurological Hospital, Lyons, France.
Victor MayoralAnaesthesiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, El Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Barcelona, Spain.
Antwerp University Hospital · BEBellvitge University Hospital · ESGartnavel General Hospital · GBHospital del Trabajador · CLKiel University · DEOspedale di Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When peripheral neuropathic pain affects a specific, clearly demarcated area of the body, it may be described as localized neuropathic pain (LNP). Examples include postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy, as well as post-surgical and post-traumatic pain. These conditions may respond to topical treatment, i.e., pharmaceutical agents acting locally on the peripheral nervous system, and the topical route offers advantages over systemic administration. Notably, only a small fraction of the dose reaches the systemic circulation, thereby reducing the risk of systemic adverse effects, drug-drug interactions and overdose. From the patient's perspective, the analgesic agent is easily applied to the most painful area(s). The 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster has been used for several years to treat LNP and is registered in approximately 50 countries. Many clinical guidelines recommend this treatment modality as a first-line option for treating LNP, particularly in frail and/or elderly patients and those receiving multiple medications, because the benefit-to-risk ratios are far better than those of systemic analgesics. However, some guidelines make only a weak recommendation for its use. This paper considers the positioning of the 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster in international treatment guidelines and how they may be influenced by the specific criteria used in developing them, such as the methodology employed by randomized, placebo-controlled trials. It then examines the body of evidence supporting use of the plaster in some prevalent LNP conditions. Common themes that emerge from clinical studies are: (1) the excellent tolerability and safety of the plaster, which can increase patients' adherence to treatment, (2) continued efficacy over long-term treatment, and (3) significant reduction in the size of the painful area. On this basis, it is felt that the 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster should be more strongly recommended for treating LNP, either as one component of a multimodal approach or as monotherapy.

Indexed as

5% lidocaine-medicated plasterAllodyniaEase of useEfficacyGuidelinesLocalized neuropathic painLong-term safetyPostherpetic neuralgiaQuality of lifeReviews

Identifiers

PMID27822619
PMCPMC5130910
OpenAlexW2549088460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.