Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822594›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2017

Should we resect peri-lesional hemosiderin deposits when performing lesionectomy in patients with cavernoma-related epilepsy (CRE)?

P Dammann, C Schaller, U Sure

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P DammannDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45121, Essen, Germany. philipp.dammann@uk-essen.de.
C SchallerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
U SureDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45121, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, the authors perform a database search and summarize and discuss all eligible studies that provide (subgroup) analysis of the postoperative seizure outcome of patients with cavernoma-related epilepsy undergoing sole lesionectomy or lesionectomy including the hemosiderin rim. Based on the currently available data, the authors conclude that if surgical treatment of cavernoma-related epilepsy is performed, the peri-lesional hemosiderin should be resected. However, cases of eloquent or multiple localization or widespread hemosiderin deposit in which a complete resection is challenging should undergo a specific preoperative work-up.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeBrainEpilepsyHemangioma, CavernousHemosiderinHumansPostoperative PeriodHemosiderinCavernomaCavernous malformationCCMCREEpilepsyHemosiderin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.